Etsuko Inoue
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | 3 | 5 | 8 | Feb 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 6 | 6 | Mar 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Betsy Nagelsen | 4 | 1 | 5 | Mar 4, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC
Etsuko Inoue vs Grace Kim H2H: 0-1
Grace Kim holds a 1–0 lead over Etsuko Inoue in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Grace Kim leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Grace Kim won the 1984 Wimbledon round of 128 7-6 1-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grace Kim | 7-6 1-6 6-0 | Etsuko Inoue | Match data | Jun 27, 1984* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etsuko Inoue | #310 | #26 | 27 | 1,803 | 120 | 133 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Grace Kim | — | — | — | 1,705 | 47 | 82 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Etsuko Inoue | Grace Kim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 7–3 | 70.0% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 15 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–25 | 40.5% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1983 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 10–22 | 31.2% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #70 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #80 | 1,635 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #52 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Etsuko Inoue | Grace Kim | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 16 | 1981 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1984 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 17 | 1982 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 18 | 1983 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% |
| 19 | 1984 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1987 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 20 | 1985 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1988 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1988 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1989 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 57 | 67 | 124 | 46.0% | 14 | 18 | 32 | 43.8% | 35 | 34 | 69 | 50.7% | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | — | 28 | 35 | 63 | 44.4% | 4 | 18 | 22 | 18.2% | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 11 | 18 | 29 | 37.9% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Etsuko Inoue | Grace Kim | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1586 | 114.0 | — | — | — | — | +73 | — | — | 66.7% | +1.10 | 3–0 (100%) | 1–2 (33%) | 103.8 | +1.42 |
| 15 | 1980 | 1488 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 | 1983 | 1592 | 115.9 | — | — | — | — | +65 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.00 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.06 |
| 16 | 1981 | 1483 | 100.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.02 | 1984 | 1622 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | +26 | — | +18 | 36.6% | -1.49 | 6–3 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | 103.7 | -0.48 |
| 17 | 1982 | 1523 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | +58 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.09 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.31 | 1985 | 1694 | 125.2 | — | — | — | — | +52 | -205 | -135 | 43.4% | -0.79 | 6–9 (40%) | 6–2 (75%) | 101.5 | -0.64 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1642 | 120.1 | — | — | — | — | +5 | -38 | -81 | 52.9% | +0.06 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–0 | — | +1.48 | 1986 | 1605 | 117.7 | — | — | — | — | +47 | -126 | — | 33.3% | -1.54 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–2 (50%) | 99.0 | +0.32 |
| 19 | 1984 | 1700 | 134.3 | — | — | — | — | -9 | -31 | -114 | 50.6% | +0.12 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–5 (38%) | 98.1 | +0.10 | 1987 | 1515 | 97.7 | — | — | — | — | +45 | — | -17 | 32.6% | -1.47 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–1 | — | +2.17 |
| 20 | 1985 | 1633 | 117.6 | — | — | — | — | -18 | +12 | -71 | 41.3% | -0.66 | 5–7 (42%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.4 | +0.47 | 1988 | 1469 | 96.4 | — | — | — | — | — | -61 | — | 0.0% | -3.90 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.26 |
| 21 | 1986 | 1636 | 124.5 | — | — | — | — | -97 | — | +70 | 42.6% | -0.57 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–3 (50%) | 100.2 | -0.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 1765 | 138.1 | — | — | — | — | -109 | — | +24 | 59.0% | +0.54 | 4–9 (31%) | 3–1 (75%) | 97.8 | +0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1988 | 1703 | 132.8 | — | — | — | — | -74 | — | +78 | 48.4% | -0.06 | 4–8 (33%) | 5–2 (71%) | 97.7 | -0.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1989 | 1670 | 137.7 | — | — | — | — | -24 | — | +87 | 47.4% | -0.14 | 4–8 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.6 | -0.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 1661 | 128.5 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | +100 | 49.2% | -0.24 | 4–3 (57%) | 5–1 (83%) | 104.2 | -0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1803 | 134.7 | — | — | — | — | -33 | -20 | +14 | 49.1% | -0.11 | 32–49 (40%) | 25–17 (60%) | 99.0 | +0.19 | — | 1705 | 119.1 | — | — | — | — | +49 | -161 | -47 | 38.2% | -1.14 | 21–19 (53%) | 11–10 (52%) | 103.5 | +1.93 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Grace Kim
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alycia Moulton | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 5, 1987 | H2H |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 16, 1986 | H2H |
| Wendy Turnbull | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 15, 1986 | H2H |
| Bonnie Gadusek | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 11, 1985 | H2H |
| Shawn Foltz | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 25, 1985 | H2H |