H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Etsuko Inoue vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-1

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 1–0 lead over Etsuko Inoue in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1990 Tokyo Japan Open fourth round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Etsuko Inoue
JPN Age 61 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 14, 1990* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 R16 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-2 6-4 Etsuko Inoue #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Etsuko Inoue #310 #26 27 1,803 120 132 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Etsuko Inoue Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 3–2 60.0% — 1,523 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1983 17–15 53.1% — 1,642 0 1 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1984 19–19 50.0% #68 1,700 0 2 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1985 13–21 38.2% #70 1,633 0 2 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1986 9–14 39.1% #80 1,636 0 2 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1987 20–15 57.1% #30 1,765 0 2 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1988 11–13 45.8% #52 1,729 0 2 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1989 15–18 45.5% #68 1,678 0 2 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1990 13–13 50.0% #70 1,665 0 2 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8