Etsuko Inoue
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | 3 | 5 | 8 | Feb 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 6 | 6 | Mar 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Betsy Nagelsen | 4 | 1 | 5 | Mar 4, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Etsuko Inoue and Laura Arraya are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Etsuko Inoue leads 1–0 on grass, while Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Etsuko Inoue won the 1986 Eastbourne Open round of 64 3-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etsuko Inoue | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Laura Arraya | Match data | Jun 18, 1986* | R64 | Eastbourne Open | WTA 250 | Grass |
| Laura Arraya | 7-6 5-7 6-4 | Etsuko Inoue | Match data | Jan 19, 1984* | R32 | Denver | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etsuko Inoue | #310 | #26 | 27 | 1,803 | 120 | 133 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Etsuko Inoue | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1983 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1984 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1985 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #70 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1986 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #80 | 1,635 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,691 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #52 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,732 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Etsuko Inoue | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1981 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 23 | 10 | 33 | 69.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1984 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1983 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 20 | 1985 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1984 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 19 | 7 | 26 | 73.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 21 | 1986 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1985 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 22 | 1987 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1986 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% |
| 23 | 1988 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1987 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1989 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1989 | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| Career | — | 57 | 67 | 124 | 46.0% | 14 | 18 | 32 | 43.8% | 35 | 34 | 69 | 50.7% | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | — | 105 | 80 | 185 | 56.8% | 103 | 73 | 176 | 58.5% | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 28 | 31 | 59 | 47.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Etsuko Inoue | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1980 | 1488 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 1483 | 100.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 1523 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | +58 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.09 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.31 | 1981 | 1685 | 129.1 | — | — | — | — | -70 | — | — | 65.6% | +0.74 | 5–2 (71%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | -1.24 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1642 | 120.1 | — | — | — | — | +5 | -38 | -81 | 52.9% | +0.06 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–0 | — | +1.48 | 1982 | 1742 | 126.9 | — | — | — | — | -61 | -27 | — | 62.7% | +0.91 | 10–8 (56%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | +2.71 |
| 19 | 1984 | 1700 | 134.3 | — | — | — | — | -9 | -31 | -114 | 50.6% | +0.12 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | +0.10 | 1983 | 1713 | 125.7 | — | — | — | — | +8 | +30 | — | 51.4% | -0.24 | 8–11 (42%) | 3–4 (43%) | — | +0.84 |
| 20 | 1985 | 1633 | 117.6 | — | — | — | — | -18 | +12 | -71 | 41.3% | -0.66 | 5–7 (42%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.47 | 1984 | 1760 | 130.6 | — | — | — | — | -102 | +141 | -132 | 53.8% | +0.03 | 18–5 (78%) | 9–4 (69%) | — | +0.94 |
| 21 | 1986 | 1636 | 124.5 | — | — | — | — | -97 | — | +70 | 42.6% | -0.57 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | -0.52 | 1985 | 1692 | 124.9 | — | — | — | — | -2 | +60 | — | 45.1% | -0.27 | 8–7 (53%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | +1.84 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1765 | 138.1 | — | — | — | — | -109 | — | +24 | 59.0% | +0.54 | 4–9 (31%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | +0.20 | 1986 | 1718 | 138.1 | — | — | — | — | -26 | +100 | — | 51.0% | -0.04 | 5–7 (42%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | -1.79 |
| 23 | 1988 | 1703 | 132.8 | — | — | — | — | -74 | — | +78 | 48.4% | -0.06 | 4–8 (33%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | -0.96 | 1987 | 1770 | 133.4 | — | — | — | — | -31 | -11 | -184 | 51.6% | +0.05 | 3–1 (75%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | -2.60 |
| 24 | 1989 | 1670 | 137.7 | — | — | — | — | -24 | — | +87 | 47.4% | -0.14 | 4–8 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 1661 | 128.5 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | +100 | 49.2% | -0.24 | 4–3 (57%) | 5–1 (83%) | — | -0.07 | 1989 | 1883 | 136.8 | — | — | — | — | -8 | -146 | -254 | 65.2% | +0.79 | 7–4 (64%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.41 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1821 | 141.9 | — | — | — | — | +31 | -55 | -173 | 55.4% | +0.46 | 7–4 (64%) | 5–8 (38%) | — | +0.41 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1823 | 132.7 | — | — | — | — | +13 | -70 | -95 | 56.9% | +0.19 | 10–4 (71%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | +2.96 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1733 | 139.0 | — | — | — | — | +2 | +53 | +3 | 49.4% | +0.06 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | +1.62 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1682 | 125.0 | — | — | — | — | +13 | +124 | +9 | 44.0% | -0.66 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–0 | — | -0.06 |
| Career | — | 1803 | 134.7 | — | — | — | — | -33 | -20 | +14 | 49.1% | -0.11 | 32–49 (40%) | 25–17 (60%) | 99.0 | +0.19 | — | 1923 | 138.4 | — | — | — | — | -10 | +27 | -133 | 54.6% | +0.19 | 90–63 (59%) | 50–44 (53%) | 104.5 | +1.27 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | 3 | 5 | 8 | Feb 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 6 | 6 | Mar 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Betsy Nagelsen | 4 | 1 | 5 | Mar 4, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mareen Louie Harper | 5 | 3 | 8 | Jan 31, 1992 | H2H |
| Lori Mcneil | 2 | 5 | 7 | Oct 23, 1992 | H2H |
| Pilar Vasquez | 6 | 1 | 7 | Jan 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Patricia Medrado | 5 | 2 | 7 | Oct 9, 1986 | H2H |
| Akiko Kijimuta | 6 | 0 | 6 | Feb 1, 1992 | H2H |