Etsuko Inoue
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | 3 | 5 | 8 | Feb 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 6 | 6 | Mar 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Betsy Nagelsen | 4 | 1 | 5 | Mar 4, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC
Lucia Romanov holds a 1–0 lead over Etsuko Inoue in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucia Romanov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucia Romanov won the 1984 Salt Lake City round of 32 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucia Romanov | 6-4 7-5 | Etsuko Inoue | Match data | Sep 13, 1984* | R32 | Salt Lake City | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etsuko Inoue | — | #26 | 27 | 1,803 | 120 | 133 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Lucia Romanov | — | — | — | 1,798 | 47 | 78 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Etsuko Inoue | Lucia Romanov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 6–18 | 25.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #80 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #52 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Etsuko Inoue | Lucia Romanov | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1981 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1979 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1982 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% |
| 1983 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 1984 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1982 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 1985 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1983 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1986 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1984 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 57 | 67 | 124 | 46.0% | 14 | 18 | 32 | 43.8% | 35 | 34 | 69 | 50.7% | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | Career | 14 | 22 | 36 | 38.9% | 21 | 26 | 47 | 44.7% | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 6 | 18 | 24 | 25.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Etsuko Inoue | Lucia Romanov | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1980 | 1488 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.10 | 1979 | 1555 | 122.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +17 | — | 42.9% | -0.50 | — | 1–0 | — | -0.09 |
| 1981 | 1484 | 100.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.02 | 1980 | 1614 | 121.1 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -60 | — | 40.7% | -0.63 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–0 | — | -0.13 |
| 1982 | 1523 | 98.6 | — | — | — | — | +58 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.09 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.31 | 1981 | 1683 | 132.5 | — | — | — | — | -37 | +21 | -152 | 41.8% | -0.58 | 4–3 (57%) | 1–0 | — | -2.15 |
| 1983 | 1642 | 120.2 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -37 | -81 | 52.9% | +0.06 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–0 | — | +1.52 | 1982 | 1757 | 135.4 | — | — | — | — | -152 | +5 | -112 | 46.3% | -0.41 | 5–3 (63%) | 0–1 | — | -1.28 |
| 1984 | 1700 | 134.4 | — | — | — | — | -8 | -31 | -113 | 50.6% | +0.12 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–5 (38%) | 98.1 | -0.03 | 1983 | 1598 | 101.9 | — | — | — | — | -77 | +83 | +24 | 29.6% | -1.41 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–2 | — | +0.28 |
| 1985 | 1634 | 117.7 | — | — | — | — | -18 | +11 | -72 | 41.3% | -0.66 | 5–7 (42%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.4 | +0.45 | 1984 | 1510 | 103.1 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +121 | — | 39.1% | -0.78 | 2–6 (25%) | 0–2 | — | +1.87 |
| 1986 | 1636 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | -96 | — | +70 | 42.6% | -0.57 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–3 (50%) | 100.2 | -0.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1765 | 138.1 | — | — | — | — | -110 | — | +24 | 59.0% | +0.54 | 4–9 (31%) | 3–1 (75%) | 97.8 | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1703 | 132.9 | — | — | — | — | -74 | — | +78 | 48.4% | -0.06 | 4–8 (33%) | 5–2 (71%) | 97.7 | -1.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 1670 | 137.7 | — | — | — | — | -24 | — | +88 | 47.4% | -0.14 | 4–8 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.6 | -0.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 1661 | 128.6 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | +100 | 49.2% | -0.24 | 4–3 (57%) | 5–1 (83%) | 104.2 | -0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1804 | 134.8 | — | — | — | — | -32 | -20 | +14 | 49.1% | -0.11 | 32–49 (40%) | 25–17 (60%) | 99.0 | -0.03 | Career | 1798 | 125.3 | — | — | — | — | -45 | +41 | -93 | 39.7% | -0.75 | 15–20 (43%) | 4–5 (44%) | 99.5 | -1.21 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | 3 | 5 | 8 | Feb 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 6 | 6 | Mar 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Betsy Nagelsen | 4 | 1 | 5 | Mar 4, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Hobbs | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 11, 1983 | H2H |
| Tracy Austin | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 16, 1983 | H2H |
| Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 6, 1983 | H2H |
| Virginia Wade | 3 | 0 | 3 | Jun 16, 1982 | H2H |
| Chris Evert | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 3, 1982 | H2H |