H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Etsuko Inoue vs Nicole Bradtke H2H: 1-0
Etsuko Inoue holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Bradtke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Etsuko Inoue leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Etsuko Inoue won the 1989 Sydney third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 61
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 1989* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Etsuko Inoue | 6-4 6-4 | Nicole Bradtke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etsuko Inoue | #310 | #26 | 27 | 1,803 | 120 | 132 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nicole Bradtke | #394 | #24 | 256 | 1,868 | 181 | 162 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Etsuko Inoue | Nicole Bradtke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #123 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #78 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #61 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #70 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #80 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #45 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #26 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #394 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 |