H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Eun-Ha Kim vs Ann Grossman H2H: 0-1

Ann Grossman holds a 1–0 lead over Eun-Ha Kim in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ann Grossman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1995 China Open round of 32 6-0 6-4.

KOR Age 51 Right-Handed
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ann Grossman #100 6-0 6-4 Eun-Ha Kim #272 Match data Sep 28, 1995* R32 China Open Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eun-Ha Kim #1,081 #141 198 1,521 2 7 22.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,887 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eun-Ha Kim Ann Grossman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0
17 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0
18 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0
19 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,748 0 0
20 1995 0–1 0.0% #259 1,492 0 0 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,638 0 0
21 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,733 0 0
22 1997 2–2 50.0% #157 1,510 0 0 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,804 0 0
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #174 1,501 0 0 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0
24 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0
25 2000 0–1 0.0% #199 1,484 0 0 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,665 0 0
26 2001 0–2 0.0% #185 1,457 0 0 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0
27 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eun-Ha Kim Ann Grossman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1988 13 11 24 54.2% 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1989 16 11 27 59.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1990 9 12 21 42.9% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1992 15 8 23 65.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1997 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 16 10 26 61.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1995 5 10 15 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 111 106 217 51.2% 59 56 115 51.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 11 14 25 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eun-Ha Kim Ann Grossman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1497 101.9 0.0% -4.00 -0.15
17 1988 1699 133.9 +28 54.1% +0.13 4–3 (57%) 0–5 (0%) 100.1 +0.16
18 1989 1737 136.2 +43 -89 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -1.22
19 1990 1749 136.3 -12 +8 51.0% +0.02 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) -1.48
20 1995 1492 100.8 0.0% -4.00 -0.14 1991 1638 126.7 -16 +89 44.3% +0.06 3–7 (30%) 2–6 (25%) 91.9 +0.49
21 1992 1733 132.9 +24 -9 52.9% -0.03 6–3 (67%) 6–1 (86%) 108.7 +1.73
22 1997 1511 107.7 +36 50.0% +0.25 +0.15 1993 1805 140.5 +9 -60 59.6% +0.62 6–7 (46%) 6–3 (67%) 103.6 +0.77
23 1998 1502 102.3 33.3% -2.00 0–1 -0.09 1994 1853 146.2 0 -73 -249 53.6% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 107.3 -1.02
24 1995 1681 123.7 +38 +44 40.8% -0.46 4–5 (44%) 3–9 (25%) 92.7 +0.33
25 2000 1485 99.7 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 +0.14 1996 1666 130.2 +49 +8 42.9% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 0–2 -0.99
26 2001 1458 95.7 20.0% -2.20 0–1 +0.14 1997 1615 123.7 +26 +98 38.6% -1.25 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.1 -0.41
27 1998 1595 103.2 +41 +76 33.3% -1.58 1–0 +0.11
Career 1522 103.0 +36 33.3% -1.14 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +2.22 1888 140.3 +18 +6 -249 49.9% -0.10 53–53 (50%) 31–39 (44%) 99.5 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.