H2H data updated: 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC

Eun-Ha Kim vs Naoko Kijimuta H2H: 0-1

Naoko Kijimuta holds a 1–0 lead over Eun-Ha Kim in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naoko Kijimuta leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naoko Kijimuta won the 1997 Japan Women's Open round of 32 6-3 6-2.

KOR Age 51 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
JPN Age 54 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naoko Kijimuta #54 6-3 6-2 Eun-Ha Kim #267 Match data Apr 17, 1997* R32 Japan Women's Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eun-Ha Kim — #141 198 1,521 2 7 22.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Naoko Kijimuta — #44 529 1,696 37 57 39.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eun-Ha Kim Naoko Kijimuta
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1989 1–1 50.0% — 1,513 0 0
20 1995 0–1 0.0% #259 1,492 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #315 1,496 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
22 1997 2–2 50.0% #157 1,510 0 0 1994 2–7 22.2% #156 1,480 0 0
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #174 1,501 0 0 1995 6–6 50.0% #87 1,556 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1996 17–18 48.6% #45 1,682 0 0
25 2000 0–1 0.0% #199 1,484 0 0 1997 10–17 37.0% #74 1,669 0 0
26 2001 0–2 0.0% #185 1,457 0 0 1998 1–6 14.3% #279 1,595 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eun-Ha Kim Naoko Kijimuta
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 14 11 25 56.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 4 12 16 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — 26 40 66 39.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eun-Ha Kim Naoko Kijimuta
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1514 104.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.24
20 1995 1492 100.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.14 1992 1497 99.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.21
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1490 103.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — 0.00
22 1997 1511 107.7 — — — — +35 — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — +0.15 1994 1480 119.3 — — — — +27 — — 25.0% -1.40 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.38
23 1998 1502 102.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.09 1995 1556 125.2 — — — — +18 — — 48.3% +0.31 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.31
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1682 139.7 — — — — +22 -92 -129 50.0% +0.20 5–7 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.8 -0.53
25 2000 1485 99.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.14 1997 1670 130.1 — — — — -56 -37 -27 40.9% -0.74 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 99.4 -1.71
26 2001 1458 95.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — +0.14 1998 1595 103.6 — — — — -39 — — 27.8% -2.11 1–3 (25%) — — +0.31
Career — 1522 103.0 — — — — +35 — — 33.3% -1.14 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +2.22 — 1697 134.7 — — — — -1 -67 -65 42.7% -0.43 15–22 (41%) 5–11 (31%) 96.6 -1.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.