Eva Krapl
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Henricksson | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 27, 1989 | H2H |
| Claudia Porwik | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 5, 1989 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 9, 1989 | H2H |
| Michelle Jaggard Lai | 2 | 0 | 2 | Apr 28, 1989 | H2H |
| Andrea Holikova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 21, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Akiko Kijimuta holds a 1–0 lead over Eva Krapl in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Akiko Kijimuta leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Akiko Kijimuta won the 1987 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-1 2-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akiko Kijimuta | 6-1 2-6 7-6 | Eva Krapl | Match data | Feb 24, 1987* | R128 | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Krapl | #635 | #94 | 11 | 1,559 | 35 | 67 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Akiko Kijimuta | #565 | #49 | 21 | 1,694 | 60 | 94 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Akiko Kijimuta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #172 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #124 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #80 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #129 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #120 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #115 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #115 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #66 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #202 | 1,403 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #149 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Akiko Kijimuta | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 1985 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1988 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1987 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1988 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1990 | 1 | 10 | 11 | 9.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 23 | 1989 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1990 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 18 | 30 | 48 | 37.5% | 11 | 21 | 32 | 34.4% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | 28 | 52 | 80 | 35.0% | 13 | 18 | 31 | 41.9% | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Akiko Kijimuta | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1981 | 1495 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.33 | 1983 | 1491 | 95.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.57 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.26 |
| 16 | 1982 | 1491 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | — | — | +0.84 | 1984 | 1477 | 99.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.02 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1502 | 100.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +60 | — | 54.5% | -0.36 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.92 |
| 18 | 1984 | 1475 | 91.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | +0.20 | 1986 | 1533 | 115.1 | — | — | — | — | +56 | — | — | 51.9% | +0.37 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | +2.11 |
| 19 | 1985 | 1535 | 108.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 57.1% | +0.33 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.35 | 1987 | 1599 | 118.1 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -54 | +3 | 43.8% | -0.46 | 5–3 (63%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.32 |
| 20 | 1986 | 1493 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | +24 | +51 | — | 37.5% | -0.66 | 1–5 (17%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +1.71 | 1988 | 1555 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | -19 | — | +57 | 38.6% | -0.86 | 3–6 (33%) | 4–2 (67%) | 100.3 | +0.21 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1484 | 110.5 | — | — | — | — | -27 | +85 | +31 | 34.1% | -0.95 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–5 (0%) | 97.5 | +1.06 | 1989 | 1628 | 122.8 | — | — | — | — | -87 | -45 | +33 | 52.9% | -0.33 | 2–5 (29%) | 1–0 | — | +0.54 |
| 22 | 1988 | 1496 | 112.8 | — | — | — | — | +6 | +12 | -25 | 34.6% | -1.06 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 101.0 | +0.57 | 1990 | 1581 | 113.9 | — | — | — | — | -65 | — | — | 26.5% | -1.65 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–3 (25%) | 102.3 | -0.33 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1486 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | +4 | — | — | 37.8% | -0.89 | 4–1 (80%) | 4–3 (57%) | 106.3 | +2.34 | 1991 | 1624 | 124.7 | — | — | — | — | -59 | +2 | +22 | 44.6% | -0.49 | 7–7 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 101.7 | -1.03 |
| 24 | 1990 | 1404 | 88.5 | — | — | — | — | +55 | +30 | — | 28.0% | -1.72 | 0–3 (0%) | — | — | +1.58 | 1992 | 1579 | 121.1 | — | — | — | — | -67 | +65 | — | 32.6% | -1.46 | 4–6 (40%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.5 | -0.07 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1550 | 91.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.25 | — | — | — | +0.04 |
| Career | — | 1560 | 105.6 | — | — | — | — | +10 | +48 | 0 | 36.8% | -0.91 | 13–16 (45%) | 8–15 (35%) | 97.5 | +8.16 | — | 1694 | 124.2 | — | — | — | — | -36 | +13 | +26 | 41.0% | -0.77 | 27–30 (47%) | 13–17 (43%) | 100.8 | +1.92 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Henricksson | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 27, 1989 | H2H |
| Claudia Porwik | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 5, 1989 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 9, 1989 | H2H |
| Michelle Jaggard Lai | 2 | 0 | 2 | Apr 28, 1989 | H2H |
| Andrea Holikova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Arraya | 0 | 6 | 6 | Feb 1, 1992 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 3 | 0 | 3 | May 31, 1992 | H2H |
| Ann Grossman | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 24, 1992 | H2H |
| Rika Hiraki | 2 | 1 | 3 | Feb 7, 1992 | H2H |
| Mercedes Paz | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jun 26, 1991 | H2H |