Eva Krapl
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Henricksson | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 27, 1989 | H2H |
| Claudia Porwik | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 5, 1989 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 9, 1989 | H2H |
| Michelle Jaggard Lai | 2 | 0 | 2 | Apr 28, 1989 | H2H |
| Andrea Holikova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 21, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Eva Krapl vs Dianne Van Rensburg H2H: 0-1
Dianne Van Rensburg holds a 1–0 lead over Eva Krapl in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dianne Van Rensburg leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dianne Van Rensburg won the 1989 Wimbledon round of 128 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
RSA
Age 58
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dianne Van Rensburg | 6-3 6-1 | Eva Krapl | Match data | Jun 28, 1989* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Krapl | #635 | #94 | 11 | 1,559 | 35 | 67 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dianne Van Rensburg | — | — | — | 1,790 | 82 | 92 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Dianne Van Rensburg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #129 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–19 | 47.2% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #120 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #115 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #202 | 1,403 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Dianne Van Rensburg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1988 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 21 | 1987 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 22 | 1988 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1990 | 18 | 8 | 26 | 69.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 23 | 1989 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1990 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 18 | 30 | 48 | 37.5% | 11 | 21 | 32 | 34.4% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | 53 | 45 | 98 | 54.1% | 9 | 17 | 26 | 34.6% | 14 | 19 | 33 | 42.4% | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Dianne Van Rensburg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1981 | 1495 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 1491 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | — | — | +0.84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 1475 | 91.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | +0.20 | 1986 | 1643 | 122.2 | — | — | — | — | +3 | — | -6 | 51.1% | -0.02 | 6–3 (67%) | 3–0 (100%) | 108.4 | +0.16 |
| 19 | 1985 | 1535 | 108.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 57.1% | +0.33 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.35 | 1987 | 1598 | 114.7 | — | — | — | — | +12 | -97 | +48 | 37.7% | -1.01 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.7 | -0.96 |
| 20 | 1986 | 1493 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | +24 | +51 | — | 37.5% | -0.66 | 1–5 (17%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +1.71 | 1988 | 1699 | 135.4 | — | — | — | — | -38 | -169 | -16 | 50.6% | +0.06 | 6–9 (40%) | 3–4 (43%) | 100.5 | -1.73 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1484 | 110.5 | — | — | — | — | -27 | +85 | +31 | 34.1% | -0.95 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–5 (0%) | 97.5 | +1.06 | 1989 | 1653 | 133.1 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -138 | +24 | 46.8% | -0.52 | 1–6 (14%) | 1–3 (25%) | 93.7 | -0.34 |
| 22 | 1988 | 1496 | 112.8 | — | — | — | — | +6 | +12 | -25 | 34.6% | -1.06 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 101.0 | +0.57 | 1990 | 1770 | 142.6 | — | — | — | — | +68 | -265 | -94 | 56.0% | +0.38 | 8–5 (62%) | 6–6 (50%) | 104.0 | -0.17 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1486 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | +4 | — | — | 37.8% | -0.89 | 4–1 (80%) | 4–3 (57%) | 106.3 | +2.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1990 | 1404 | 88.5 | — | — | — | — | +55 | +30 | — | 28.0% | -1.72 | 0–3 (0%) | — | — | +1.58 | 1992 | 1748 | 96.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.14 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1731 | 115.9 | — | — | — | — | +47 | — | — | 43.8% | -0.81 | 1–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.48 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1697 | 109.2 | — | — | — | — | +50 | — | — | 46.7% | -0.53 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.24 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1673 | 96.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.01 |
| Career | — | 1560 | 105.6 | — | — | — | — | +10 | +48 | 0 | 36.8% | -0.91 | 13–16 (45%) | 8–15 (35%) | 97.5 | +8.16 | — | 1790 | 134.8 | — | — | — | — | +23 | -158 | +6 | 48.1% | -0.26 | 27–30 (47%) | 18–15 (55%) | 105.0 | -2.07 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Dianne Van Rensburg
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 22, 1993 | H2H |
| Wendy White | 5 | 0 | 5 | Aug 10, 1990 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 9, 1990 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 20, 1990 | H2H |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 0 | 4 | 4 | Oct 26, 1989 | H2H |