Eva Krapl
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Henricksson | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 27, 1989 | H2H |
| Claudia Porwik | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 5, 1989 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 9, 1989 | H2H |
| Michelle Jaggard Lai | 2 | 0 | 2 | Apr 28, 1989 | H2H |
| Andrea Holikova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 21, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Emanuela Zardo holds a 1–0 lead over Eva Krapl in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emanuela Zardo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emanuela Zardo won the 1990 Geneva round of 32 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emanuela Zardo | 6-1 6-3 | Eva Krapl | Match data | May 24, 1990* | R32 | Geneva | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Krapl | #635 | #94 | 11 | 1,559 | 35 | 67 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Emanuela Zardo | #976 | #27 | 80 | 1,756 | 69 | 75 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Emanuela Zardo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #129 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #120 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #115 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #73 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #202 | 1,403 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #89 | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Emanuela Zardo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1990 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1987 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1991 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1988 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1992 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 1989 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 24 | 1990 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 18 | 30 | 48 | 37.5% | 11 | 21 | 32 | 34.4% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | 15 | 25 | 40 | 37.5% | 49 | 38 | 87 | 56.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Emanuela Zardo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1981 | 1495 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 1491 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | — | — | +0.84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1488 | 96.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.01 |
| 18 | 1984 | 1475 | 91.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | +0.20 | 1988 | 1477 | 101.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.05 |
| 19 | 1985 | 1535 | 108.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 57.1% | +0.33 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.35 | 1989 | 1450 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.86 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.13 |
| 20 | 1986 | 1493 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | +24 | +51 | — | 37.5% | -0.66 | 1–5 (17%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +1.71 | 1990 | 1594 | 122.2 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -2 | — | 50.9% | +0.26 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–4 (50%) | 102.9 | +0.71 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1484 | 110.5 | — | — | — | — | -27 | +85 | +31 | 34.1% | -0.95 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–5 (0%) | 97.5 | +1.06 | 1991 | 1714 | 136.8 | — | — | — | — | -190 | +100 | — | 58.1% | +0.87 | 4–2 (67%) | 0–3 (0%) | 101.3 | +0.08 |
| 22 | 1988 | 1496 | 112.8 | — | — | — | — | +6 | +12 | -25 | 34.6% | -1.06 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 101.0 | +0.57 | 1992 | 1741 | 131.9 | — | — | — | — | -208 | +113 | — | 51.4% | -0.15 | 6–2 (75%) | 2–1 (67%) | 106.9 | -0.32 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1486 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | +4 | — | — | 37.8% | -0.89 | 4–1 (80%) | 4–3 (57%) | 106.3 | +2.34 | 1993 | 1651 | 114.5 | — | — | — | — | -126 | +136 | — | 41.9% | -0.50 | 4–2 (67%) | 5–3 (63%) | 104.1 | +0.44 |
| 24 | 1990 | 1404 | 88.5 | — | — | — | — | +55 | +30 | — | 28.0% | -1.72 | 0–3 (0%) | — | — | +1.58 | 1994 | 1575 | 109.2 | — | — | — | — | -11 | +87 | — | 41.7% | -0.46 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–5 (38%) | 97.3 | +1.56 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1542 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | -20 | — | — | 0.0% | -2.83 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.22 |
| Career | — | 1560 | 105.6 | — | — | — | — | +10 | +48 | 0 | 36.8% | -0.91 | 13–16 (45%) | 8–15 (35%) | 97.5 | +8.16 | — | 1756 | 126.9 | — | — | — | — | -99 | +89 | — | 47.0% | -0.14 | 20–13 (61%) | 14–17 (45%) | 105.2 | +1.68 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Henricksson | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 27, 1989 | H2H |
| Claudia Porwik | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 5, 1989 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 9, 1989 | H2H |
| Michelle Jaggard Lai | 2 | 0 | 2 | Apr 28, 1989 | H2H |
| Andrea Holikova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silvia Farina Elia | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 18, 1995 | H2H |
| Barbara Paulus | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jan 18, 1995 | H2H |
| Fang Li | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 22, 1994 | H2H |
| Gigi Fernandez | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 23, 1994 | H2H |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 22, 1993 | H2H |