H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Eva Krapl vs Federica Bonsignori H2H: 1-1
Eva Krapl and Federica Bonsignori are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Eva Krapl won the 1989 Brisbane second round 7-5 6-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 60
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 1989* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Eva Krapl | 7-5 6-7 6-3 | Federica Bonsignori | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1987* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Federica Bonsignori | 6-2 6-4 | Eva Krapl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Krapl | #635 | #94 | 11 | 1,560 | 35 | 67 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Federica Bonsignori | #813 | #28 | 30 | 1,709 | 75 | 112 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Federica Bonsignori | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #144 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #142 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #122 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #129 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #143 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #115 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #77 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #50 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #202 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #114 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #211 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |