H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Eva Krapl vs Laura Golarsa H2H: 1-1
Eva Krapl and Laura Golarsa are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Eva Krapl leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Eva Krapl won the 1988 Rome second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 60
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 1988* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Eva Krapl | 6-3 6-2 | Laura Golarsa | Match data |
| Sep 15, 1985* | Manhasset | WTA 250 | F | — | Laura Golarsa | 7-6 6-2 | Eva Krapl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Krapl | #635 | #94 | 11 | 1,560 | 35 | 67 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laura Golarsa | #693 | #39 | 436 | 1,761 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Laura Golarsa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #121 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #129 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #79 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #58 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #115 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #61 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #213 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #202 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #112 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #149 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #168 | 1,513 | 0 | 1 |