H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Eva Krapl vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 1-0
Eva Krapl holds a 1–0 lead over Mercedes Paz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eva Krapl leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eva Krapl won the 1986 San Juan third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 60
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1986* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Eva Krapl | 6-1 6-3 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Krapl | #635 | #94 | 11 | 1,560 | 35 | 67 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Mercedes Paz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #129 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #115 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #202 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |