H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Eva Krapl vs Michelle Jaggard Lai H2H: 2-0
Eva Krapl holds a 2–0 lead over Michelle Jaggard Lai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Eva Krapl leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eva Krapl won the 1989 Taipei fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 60
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 57
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 1989* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Eva Krapl | 6-3 6-4 | Michelle Jaggard Lai | Match data |
| Apr 14, 1989* | Singapore | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Eva Krapl | 6-2 6-1 | Michelle Jaggard Lai | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Krapl | #635 | #94 | 11 | 1,560 | 35 | 67 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michelle Jaggard Lai | — | — | — | 1,639 | 61 | 105 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Michelle Jaggard Lai | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #129 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #115 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #202 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |