Eva Krapl
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Henricksson | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 27, 1989 | H2H |
| Claudia Porwik | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 5, 1989 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 9, 1989 | H2H |
| Michelle Jaggard Lai | 2 | 0 | 2 | Apr 28, 1989 | H2H |
| Andrea Holikova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 21, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Eva Krapl vs Michelle Jaggard Lai H2H: 2-0
Eva Krapl holds a 2–0 lead over Michelle Jaggard Lai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Eva Krapl leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eva Krapl won the 1989 Taipei round of 16 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
2
–
0
2 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Krapl | 6-3 6-4 | Michelle Jaggard Lai | Match data | Apr 28, 1989* | R16 | Taipei | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Eva Krapl | 6-2 6-1 | Michelle Jaggard Lai | Match data | Apr 14, 1989* | R16 | Singapore | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Krapl | #635 | #94 | 11 | 1,559 | 35 | 67 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michelle Jaggard Lai | — | — | — | 1,639 | 61 | 105 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Michelle Jaggard Lai | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #129 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #120 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #115 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #202 | 1,403 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Michelle Jaggard Lai | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1985 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1989 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1987 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1990 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1988 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1991 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 1989 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1990 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 18 | 30 | 48 | 37.5% | 11 | 21 | 32 | 34.4% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | 49 | 60 | 109 | 45.0% | 2 | 15 | 17 | 11.8% | 9 | 21 | 30 | 30.0% | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Michelle Jaggard Lai | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1981 | 1495 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 1491 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | — | — | +0.84 | 1985 | 1459 | 99.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11.1% | -2.89 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.14 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1442 | 96.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.60 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.04 |
| 18 | 1984 | 1475 | 91.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | +0.20 | 1987 | 1511 | 110.2 | — | — | — | — | +92 | — | +3 | 43.6% | -0.13 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–4 (20%) | 96.5 | +1.25 |
| 19 | 1985 | 1535 | 108.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 57.1% | +0.33 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.35 | 1988 | 1515 | 101.4 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | -67 | 36.4% | -0.91 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–0 | — | +1.65 |
| 20 | 1986 | 1493 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | +24 | +51 | — | 37.5% | -0.66 | 1–5 (17%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +1.71 | 1989 | 1499 | 106.6 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -24 | -14 | 37.9% | -0.86 | 4–4 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +2.26 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1484 | 110.5 | — | — | — | — | -27 | +85 | +31 | 34.1% | -0.95 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–5 (0%) | 97.5 | +1.06 | 1990 | 1505 | 109.2 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -35 | — | 27.8% | -1.64 | 2–0 | — | — | -0.23 |
| 22 | 1988 | 1496 | 112.8 | — | — | — | — | +6 | +12 | -25 | 34.6% | -1.06 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 101.0 | +0.57 | 1991 | 1525 | 117.5 | — | — | — | — | -2 | — | — | 36.8% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.56 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1486 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | +4 | — | — | 37.8% | -0.89 | 4–1 (80%) | 4–3 (57%) | 106.3 | +2.34 | 1992 | 1555 | 114.2 | — | — | — | — | -33 | — | -14 | 37.5% | -1.06 | 2–0 | — | — | -0.27 |
| 24 | 1990 | 1404 | 88.5 | — | — | — | — | +55 | +30 | — | 28.0% | -1.72 | 0–3 (0%) | — | — | +1.58 | 1993 | 1577 | 130.3 | — | — | — | — | +19 | — | -2 | 42.3% | -0.40 | 7–5 (58%) | 6–4 (60%) | 105.2 | -0.76 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1559 | 117.1 | — | — | — | — | +19 | — | — | 40.4% | -0.60 | 2–5 (29%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.9 | -0.39 |
| Career | — | 1560 | 105.6 | — | — | — | — | +10 | +48 | 0 | 36.8% | -0.91 | 13–16 (45%) | 8–15 (35%) | 97.5 | +8.16 | — | 1639 | 117.7 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -30 | -22 | 37.6% | -0.82 | 22–22 (50%) | 17–11 (61%) | 107.4 | +1.72 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Michelle Jaggard Lai
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Appelmans | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Lori Mcneil | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 13, 1994 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 10, 1993 | H2H |
| Bettina Fulco | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Manon Bollegraf | 3 | 0 | 3 | Jan 15, 1992 | H2H |