Eva Krapl
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Henricksson | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 27, 1989 | H2H |
| Claudia Porwik | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 5, 1989 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 9, 1989 | H2H |
| Michelle Jaggard Lai | 2 | 0 | 2 | Apr 28, 1989 | H2H |
| Andrea Holikova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 21, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Monique Javer holds a 1–0 lead over Eva Krapl in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Monique Javer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monique Javer won the 1989 Singapore quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monique Javer | 6-4 6-3 | Eva Krapl | Match data | Apr 15, 1989* | QF | Singapore | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Krapl | #635 | #94 | 11 | 1,559 | 35 | 67 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Monique Javer | #746 | #56 | 20 | 1,684 | 63 | 106 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Monique Javer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #168 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #129 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #73 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #120 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #115 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #112 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #202 | 1,403 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #72 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #185 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #779 | 1,506 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Monique Javer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1985 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1988 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1987 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1988 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1990 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1989 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 24 | 1990 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 18 | 30 | 48 | 37.5% | 11 | 21 | 32 | 34.4% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | 54 | 70 | 124 | 43.5% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 4 | 17 | 21 | 19.0% | 3 | 12 | 15 | 20.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Monique Javer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1981 | 1495 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 1491 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | — | — | +0.84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 1475 | 91.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | +0.20 | 1986 | 1503 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | +71 | — | — | 40.0% | -1.10 | — | — | — | +0.76 |
| 19 | 1985 | 1535 | 108.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 57.1% | +0.33 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.35 | 1987 | 1475 | 99.3 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 23.1% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.25 |
| 20 | 1986 | 1493 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | +24 | +51 | — | 37.5% | -0.66 | 1–5 (17%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +1.71 | 1988 | 1557 | 124.5 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | -11 | 50.9% | 0.00 | 1–6 (14%) | 3–2 (60%) | 94.9 | +0.95 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1484 | 110.5 | — | — | — | — | -27 | +85 | +31 | 34.1% | -0.95 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–5 (0%) | 97.5 | +1.06 | 1989 | 1546 | 110.6 | — | — | — | — | +26 | — | -58 | 36.4% | -1.05 | 3–4 (43%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.8 | +1.04 |
| 22 | 1988 | 1496 | 112.8 | — | — | — | — | +6 | +12 | -25 | 34.6% | -1.06 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 101.0 | +0.57 | 1990 | 1572 | 121.6 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -29 | -83 | 43.8% | -0.53 | 2–4 (33%) | 3–3 (50%) | 100.2 | +1.65 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1486 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | +4 | — | — | 37.8% | -0.89 | 4–1 (80%) | 4–3 (57%) | 106.3 | +2.34 | 1991 | 1582 | 133.9 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | — | 44.3% | -0.36 | 0–7 (0%) | 2–2 (50%) | 91.9 | -0.20 |
| 24 | 1990 | 1404 | 88.5 | — | — | — | — | +55 | +30 | — | 28.0% | -1.72 | 0–3 (0%) | — | — | +1.58 | 1992 | 1561 | 122.7 | — | — | — | — | +56 | — | — | 44.8% | -0.49 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.9 | +1.08 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1540 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | -12 | — | -32 | 34.1% | -1.24 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–3 (0%) | 96.1 | -0.15 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1518 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.3% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.50 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1507 | 94.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.01 |
| Career | — | 1560 | 105.6 | — | — | — | — | +10 | +48 | 0 | 36.8% | -0.91 | 13–16 (45%) | 8–15 (35%) | 97.5 | +8.16 | — | 1685 | 123.3 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -29 | -46 | 41.3% | -0.70 | 8–29 (22%) | 13–15 (46%) | 87.4 | +2.88 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Henricksson | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 27, 1989 | H2H |
| Claudia Porwik | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 5, 1989 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 9, 1989 | H2H |
| Michelle Jaggard Lai | 2 | 0 | 2 | Apr 28, 1989 | H2H |
| Andrea Holikova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jenny Byrne | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 16, 1992 | H2H |
| Halle Cioffi | 2 | 2 | 4 | Feb 15, 1991 | H2H |
| Caroline Kuhlman | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 17, 1993 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 17, 1993 | H2H |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 16, 1993 | H2H |