H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Eva Krapl vs Pilar Vasquez H2H: 0-1
Pilar Vasquez holds a 1–0 lead over Eva Krapl in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pilar Vasquez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pilar Vasquez won the 1990 Singapore third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 60
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
PER
Age 63
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1990* | Singapore | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Pilar Vasquez | 6-3 6-3 | Eva Krapl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Krapl | #635 | #94 | 11 | 1,560 | 35 | 67 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Pilar Vasquez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1986 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #129 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1988 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #115 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #202 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 |