H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Eva Pfaff vs Andrea Leand H2H: 1-4
Andrea Leand holds a 4–1 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Andrea Leand leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Leand won the 1991 Hamburg second round 6-2 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1991* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Andrea Leand | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
| Feb 1, 1990* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Andrea Leand | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
| Nov 30, 1984* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Andrea Leand | 6-2 6-4 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
| Oct 20, 1984* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Andrea Leand | 6-1 6-2 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
| Nov 24, 1982* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Eva Pfaff | 6-2 1-6 6-2 | Andrea Leand | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrea Leand | #857 | #27 | 13 | 1,883 | 83 | 104 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Pfaff | Andrea Leand | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #35 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #33 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #152 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #180 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |