H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Eva Pfaff vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 2-3

Andrea Temesvari holds a 3–2 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Andrea Temesvari leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Eva Pfaff leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Eva Pfaff won the 1990 San Diego round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Eva Pfaff
GER Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main-draw meetings
Andrea Temesvari
HUN Age 60 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eva Pfaff #142 6-2 6-2 Andrea Temesvari #57 Match data Aug 9, 1990* R32 San Diego Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Andrea Temesvari #40 6-4 7-5 Eva Pfaff #84 Match data Aug 20, 1986* R64 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard
Andrea Temesvari #17 6-3 6-1 Eva Pfaff #32 Match data Jan 29, 1986* R64 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard
Eva Pfaff 6-4 (ret.) Andrea Temesvari Match data Oct 29, 1983* QF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 250 Carpet
Andrea Temesvari 6-4 6-2 Eva Pfaff Match data Jul 9, 1983* F Hittfield WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eva Pfaff #420 #17 21 1,901 155 202 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Andrea Temesvari #932 #7 109 2,021 185 179 50.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eva Pfaff Andrea Temesvari
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1981 11–6 64.7% — 1,624 0 1
16 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 1982 18–14 56.2% — 1,770 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1983 42–15 73.7% — 1,989 0 4
18 — — — — — — — 1984 24–16 60.0% #14 1,889 0 4
19 1980 12–11 52.2% — 1,608 0 0 1985 18–12 60.0% #16 1,848 0 5
20 1981 14–19 42.4% — 1,632 0 0 1986 11–12 47.8% #43 1,801 0 5
21 1982 18–22 45.0% — 1,775 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #193 1,775 0 5
22 1983 31–21 59.6% — 1,856 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1984 14–14 50.0% #31 1,797 0 0 1989 18–15 54.5% #43 1,750 0 5
24 1985 9–11 45.0% #39 1,738 0 0 1990 8–19 29.6% #117 1,611 0 5
25 1986 14–19 42.4% #58 1,689 0 0 1991 6–14 30.0% #159 1,542 0 5
26 1987 19–20 48.7% #44 1,744 0 0 1992 11–12 47.8% #70 1,607 0 5
27 1988 8–17 32.0% #74 1,648 0 0 1993 5–20 20.0% #153 1,475 0 5
28 1989 12–23 34.3% #104 1,587 0 0 1994 2–7 22.2% #133 1,476 0 5
29 1990 3–12 20.0% #152 1,522 0 0 1995 6–8 42.9% #90 1,485 0 5
30 1991 1–10 9.1% #203 1,469 0 0 1996 4–6 40.0% #181 1,532 0 5
31 1992 0–2 0.0% #420 1,459 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #940 1,528 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eva Pfaff Andrea Temesvari
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
16 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2 2 4 50.0% 29 5 34 85.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4%
19 1980 — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 8 13 38.5% 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1983 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1990 1 7 8 12.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1988 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1993 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 1989 9 13 22 40.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1990 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 64 99 35.4% 34 47 81 42.0% 44 40 84 52.4% 42 50 92 45.7% — 44 57 101 43.6% 89 62 151 58.9% 15 15 30 50.0% 26 43 69 37.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eva Pfaff Andrea Temesvari
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1624 130.8 — — — — — — — 60.5% +0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — +0.26
16 1977 1481 98.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.13 1982 1771 146.3 — — — — -152 -30 -161 59.2% +0.69 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -2.86
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1989 163.0 — — — — -215 +103 -366 75.4% +2.16 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 +1.64
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1889 136.5 — — — — -78 +109 -173 61.2% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 105.3 +3.39
19 1980 1608 120.9 — — — — -1 -3 — 48.0% -0.16 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.2 -0.17 1985 1849 136.4 — — — — -49 +129 — 61.5% +0.86 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 95.7 +1.35
20 1981 1632 123.3 — — — — -25 +25 -30 45.1% -0.34 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.4 +3.33 1986 1802 139.4 — — — — -40 +157 — 55.1% +0.29 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 94.1 -1.37
21 1982 1776 132.7 — — — — -157 -167 -35 45.2% -0.12 7–6 (54%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.00 1987 1776 105.3 — — — — -40 — — 42.9% -1.29 0–1 — — -0.17
22 1983 1856 145.3 — — — — -97 -97 -29 57.1% +0.32 9–8 (53%) 9–3 (75%) 108.6 +1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1984 1797 132.6 — — — — +13 -37 -33 47.5% +0.07 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.64 1989 1751 135.2 — — — — -31 +153 — 50.0% -0.01 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.1 -0.26
24 1985 1739 120.7 — — — — +36 -86 +41 46.3% -0.29 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.71 1990 1612 121.4 — — — — +8 +190 — 34.5% -1.48 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +0.21
25 1986 1690 126.2 — — — — +52 -70 +30 42.1% -0.32 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 101.8 -0.19 1991 1542 110.6 — — — — +7 +224 +66 36.4% -1.34 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.0 +0.26
26 1987 1744 139.8 — — — — +26 -162 +23 49.4% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–3 (70%) 104.9 -1.04 1992 1607 122.1 — — — — -5 +82 +65 41.5% -0.70 7–2 (78%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 +0.25
27 1988 1648 121.4 — — — — +54 -103 +45 33.9% -1.09 5–3 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.9 +0.07 1993 1476 111.1 — — — — +31 +134 — 28.8% -1.37 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.7 +0.66
28 1989 1587 119.6 — — — — +15 — +82 36.3% -1.10 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -0.75 1994 1477 113.1 — — — — +1 +154 — 27.8% -1.83 1–1 — — -0.25
29 1990 1522 111.5 — — — — -4 — — 33.3% -1.19 0–6 (0%) 0–2 — +0.39 1995 1486 104.6 — — — — -22 +124 — 43.8% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +1.71
30 1991 1469 118.5 — — — — +22 — — 16.0% -2.28 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.6 -0.26 1996 1532 128.1 — — — — — +113 — 45.5% -0.36 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.42
31 1992 1459 103.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 1997 1529 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.29
Career — 1902 135.5 — — — — -11 -65 -2 44.1% -0.41 49–53 (48%) 36–40 (47%) 102.6 +0.12 — 2021 143.3 — — — — -57 +117 -110 52.6% +0.18 42–48 (47%) 33–38 (46%) 97.5 +1.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.