H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Eva Pfaff vs Annabel Croft H2H: 1-0
Eva Pfaff holds a 1–0 lead over Annabel Croft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eva Pfaff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eva Pfaff won the 1985 Manhattan Beach second round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 1985* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Eva Pfaff | 6-2 7-6 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,781 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Pfaff | Annabel Croft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |