H2H data updated: 2026-10-25 00:00 UTC

Eva Pfaff vs Camille Benjamin H2H: 1-2

Camille Benjamin holds a 2–1 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Camille Benjamin leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Eva Pfaff leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Camille Benjamin won the 1988 Oakland round of 32 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Eva Pfaff
GER Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Camille Benjamin
USA Age 60 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Camille Benjamin #100 6-4 7-5 Eva Pfaff #51 Match data Feb 18, 1988* R32 Oakland WTA 250 Hard
Eva Pfaff #47 7-6 6-4 Camille Benjamin #76 Match data Jun 10, 1987* R64 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Camille Benjamin #88 6-3 6-1 Eva Pfaff #58 Match data Nov 15, 1986* R16 San Juan WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eva Pfaff — #17 21 1,902 155 202 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camille Benjamin — #27 13 1,821 177 223 44.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eva Pfaff Camille Benjamin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 1982 21–14 60.0% — 1,689 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1983 22–25 46.8% — 1,715 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1984 28–27 50.9% #33 1,767 0 0
19 1980 12–11 52.2% — 1,608 0 0 1985 22–29 43.1% #62 1,629 0 0
20 1981 14–19 42.4% — 1,632 0 0 1986 19–26 42.2% #79 1,608 0 0
21 1982 18–22 45.0% — 1,776 0 0 1987 23–24 48.9% #67 1,654 0 0
22 1983 31–21 59.6% — 1,857 0 0 1988 14–23 37.8% #91 1,600 0 0
23 1984 14–14 50.0% #31 1,797 0 0 1989 14–20 41.2% #92 1,651 0 0
24 1985 9–11 45.0% — 1,739 0 0 1990 10–18 35.7% #136 1,620 0 0
25 1986 14–19 42.4% #58 1,690 0 0 1991 2–8 20.0% #225 1,559 0 0
26 1987 19–20 48.7% #44 1,744 0 0 1992 1–5 16.7% #251 1,527 0 0
27 1988 8–17 32.0% #74 1,648 0 0 1993 1–3 25.0% — 1,516 0 0
28 1989 12–23 34.3% #104 1,587 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #251 1,503 0 0
29 1990 3–12 20.0% #152 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1991 1–10 9.1% #203 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1992 0–2 0.0% #420 1,459 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eva Pfaff Camille Benjamin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 7 10 17 41.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 10 9 19 52.6% 11 8 19 57.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 1980 — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 14 12 26 53.8% 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1986 10 10 20 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
21 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 8 13 38.5% 1987 12 9 21 57.1% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1983 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 1989 10 12 22 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1990 5 10 15 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1991 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1988 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1993 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1989 9 13 22 40.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1990 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 64 99 35.4% 34 47 81 42.0% 44 40 84 52.4% 42 50 92 45.7% — 95 106 201 47.3% 41 51 92 44.6% 24 37 61 39.3% 12 27 39 30.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eva Pfaff Camille Benjamin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1977 1481 98.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.33 1982 1690 123.6 — — — — +58 — -145 54.9% +0.38 9–5 (64%) 5–3 (63%) 105.7 +0.09
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1716 124.5 — — — — -16 -37 -117 45.0% -0.65 11–8 (58%) 10–5 (67%) 107.6 -1.48
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1768 138.9 — — — — -53 -5 -97 49.6% +0.05 9–10 (47%) 7–8 (47%) 100.2 -4.31
19 1980 1608 121.1 — — — — 0 -3 — 48.0% -0.16 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.2 -0.01 1985 1629 116.9 — — — — +23 +3 +11 44.6% -0.60 4–8 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 102.2 +2.67
20 1981 1633 123.6 — — — — -26 +24 -31 45.1% -0.34 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.5 +3.20 1986 1609 118.7 — — — — -5 +36 +19 43.4% -0.36 8–8 (50%) 4–11 (27%) 96.1 +1.68
21 1982 1776 132.9 — — — — -155 -166 -35 45.2% -0.12 7–6 (54%) 4–5 (44%) 102.9 -0.97 1987 1655 128.4 — — — — -4 -9 +6 46.8% -0.24 13–6 (68%) 3–5 (38%) 107.2 -0.10
22 1983 1857 145.5 — — — — -98 -98 -30 57.1% +0.32 9–8 (53%) 9–3 (75%) 108.7 +0.77 1988 1601 121.0 — — — — -5 +27 +18 41.7% -0.76 5–7 (42%) 4–4 (50%) 98.5 +0.03
23 1984 1798 132.8 — — — — +13 -37 -34 47.5% +0.07 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.40 1989 1652 129.0 — — — — +3 -23 -85 43.9% -0.34 6–8 (43%) 1–8 (11%) 92.9 -1.46
24 1985 1740 120.9 — — — — +36 -87 +40 46.3% -0.29 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.72 1990 1620 116.6 — — — — -24 +20 -56 32.2% -1.46 4–1 (80%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -1.55
25 1986 1690 126.3 — — — — +52 -69 +30 42.1% -0.32 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 101.8 -0.11 1991 1560 107.1 — — — — -32 +85 — 28.6% -1.90 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18
26 1987 1745 139.9 — — — — +26 -163 +22 49.4% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–3 (70%) 104.9 -1.01 1992 1528 113.1 — — — — -19 — — 23.1% -2.54 0–1 0–1 — -0.34
27 1988 1649 121.4 — — — — +54 -104 +45 33.9% -1.09 5–3 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.9 -0.01 1993 1517 101.5 — — — — -10 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — +0.04
28 1989 1588 119.7 — — — — +15 — +82 36.3% -1.10 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -0.64 1994 1503 100.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.11
29 1990 1522 111.6 — — — — -3 — — 33.3% -1.19 0–6 (0%) 0–2 — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1470 118.6 — — — — +22 — — 16.0% -2.28 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.6 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1460 103.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1903 135.7 — — — — -11 -66 -3 44.1% -0.41 49–53 (48%) 36–40 (47%) 102.6 +0.24 — 1822 128.5 — — — — -2 +2 -49 44.3% -0.48 70–64 (52%) 46–54 (46%) 102.4 -1.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.