H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Eva Pfaff vs Carling Bassett Seguso H2H: 2-2

Eva Pfaff and Carling Bassett Seguso are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Eva Pfaff leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Carling Bassett Seguso leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Eva Pfaff won the 1986 Canadian Open round of 32 3-6 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Eva Pfaff
GER Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Carling Bassett Seguso
CAN Age 59 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eva Pfaff #96 3-6 6-1 6-1 Carling Bassett Seguso Match data Aug 7, 1986* R32 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Carling Bassett Seguso 4-6 6-3 6-2 Eva Pfaff Match data Jul 28, 1985* QF Manhattan Beach WTA 500 Hard
Carling Bassett Seguso 6-1 4-6 7-5 Eva Pfaff Match data Apr 15, 1983* R16 Amelia Island Championships WTA 250 Clay
Eva Pfaff 3-6 6-2 6-3 Carling Bassett Seguso Match data Aug 18, 1982* R32 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eva Pfaff — #17 21 1,902 155 202 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carling Bassett Seguso — — — 2,011 149 102 59.4% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eva Pfaff Carling Bassett Seguso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1982 2–3 40.0% — 1,521 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1983 35–21 62.5% — 1,833 0 1
16 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 1984 37–20 64.9% — 1,941 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1985 30–17 63.8% — 1,881 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1986 18–12 60.0% — 1,847 0 1
19 1980 12–11 52.2% — 1,608 0 0 1987 16–12 57.1% — 1,832 0 2
20 1981 14–19 42.4% — 1,632 0 0 1988 4–7 36.4% — 1,770 0 2
21 1982 18–22 45.0% — 1,776 0 0 1989 3–4 42.9% — 1,756 0 2
22 1983 31–21 59.6% — 1,857 0 0 1990 3–3 50.0% — 1,761 0 2
23 1984 14–14 50.0% #31 1,797 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1985 9–11 45.0% — 1,739 0 0 1992 1–3 25.0% — 1,729 0 2
25 1986 14–19 42.4% #58 1,690 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1987 19–20 48.7% #44 1,744 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1988 8–17 32.0% #74 1,648 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1989 12–23 34.3% #104 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1990 3–12 20.0% #152 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1991 1–10 9.1% #203 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1992 0–2 0.0% #420 1,459 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eva Pfaff Carling Bassett Seguso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 12 6 18 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
16 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 9 3 12 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 18 6 24 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1980 — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 8 13 38.5% 1989 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1983 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1988 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 9 13 22 40.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 64 99 35.4% 34 47 81 42.0% 44 40 84 52.4% 42 50 92 45.7% — 56 38 94 59.6% 49 23 72 68.1% 21 17 38 55.3% 23 24 47 48.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eva Pfaff Carling Bassett Seguso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1522 110.1 — — — — +59 — — 50.0% -0.25 0–2 1–0 — +0.22
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1833 140.5 — — — — -64 -80 -108 59.8% +0.66 9–5 (64%) 7–4 (64%) 110.3 +0.30
16 1977 1481 98.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.33 1984 1941 159.2 — — — — -36 -5 -187 63.0% +0.84 7–6 (54%) 5–2 (71%) 104.1 -3.25
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1881 145.4 — — — — +32 +23 -161 61.3% +0.77 7–5 (58%) 2–4 (33%) 96.5 +2.10
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1848 144.0 — — — — -1 +74 -76 56.9% +0.43 7–5 (58%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 -1.30
19 1980 1608 121.1 — — — — 0 -3 — 48.0% -0.16 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.2 -0.01 1987 1832 140.5 — — — — -35 +154 -85 57.1% +0.49 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 99.9 -0.67
20 1981 1633 123.6 — — — — -26 +24 -31 45.1% -0.34 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.5 +3.20 1988 1771 121.4 — — — — -28 — — 41.7% -0.08 0–2 0–2 — -1.12
21 1982 1776 132.9 — — — — -155 -166 -35 45.2% -0.12 7–6 (54%) 4–5 (44%) 102.9 -0.97 1989 1757 117.9 — — — — -30 — — 46.2% -0.77 1–0 0–1 — -0.78
22 1983 1857 145.5 — — — — -98 -98 -30 57.1% +0.32 9–8 (53%) 9–3 (75%) 108.7 +0.77 1990 1761 124.9 — — — — — +191 — 50.0% +0.07 1–1 — — -0.23
23 1984 1798 132.8 — — — — +13 -37 -34 47.5% +0.07 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1985 1740 120.9 — — — — +36 -87 +40 46.3% -0.29 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.72 1992 1730 109.6 — — — — — — — 22.2% -1.67 1–0 — — -0.51
25 1986 1690 126.3 — — — — +52 -69 +30 42.1% -0.32 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 101.8 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1987 1745 139.9 — — — — +26 -163 +22 49.4% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–3 (70%) 104.9 -1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1988 1649 121.4 — — — — +54 -104 +45 33.9% -1.09 5–3 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.9 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 1588 119.7 — — — — +15 — +82 36.3% -1.10 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1522 111.6 — — — — -3 — — 33.3% -1.19 0–6 (0%) 0–2 — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1470 118.6 — — — — +22 — — 16.0% -2.28 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.6 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1460 103.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1903 135.7 — — — — -11 -66 -3 44.1% -0.41 49–53 (48%) 36–40 (47%) 102.6 +0.24 — 2011 151.0 — — — — -15 +28 -122 58.0% +0.54 38–30 (56%) 20–19 (51%) 102.7 -2.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.