H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Eva Pfaff vs Donna Faber H2H: 0-2

Donna Faber holds a 2–0 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Donna Faber leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Faber won the 1991 Eastbourne Open round of 64 2-6 6-4 6-1.

GER Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 2
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Donna Faber #107 2-6 6-4 6-1 Eva Pfaff #152 Match data Jun 19, 1991* R64 Eastbourne Open Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Donna Faber #59 6-3 6-0 Eva Pfaff #106 Match data Jan 17, 1990* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eva Pfaff #420 #17 21 1,901 155 202 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Donna Faber #227 #55 19 1,718 68 97 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eva Pfaff Donna Faber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 1–2 33.3% #218 1,495 0 0
16 1977 0–1 0.0% 1,481 0 0 1988 6–9 40.0% #131 1,532 0 0
17 1989 19–19 50.0% #59 1,674 0 0
18 1990 15–18 45.5% #84 1,630 0 0
19 1980 12–11 52.2% 1,608 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #99 1,593 0 0
20 1981 14–19 42.4% 1,632 0 0 1992 11–20 35.5% #116 1,541 0 0
21 1982 18–22 45.0% 1,775 0 0 1993 1–10 9.1% #227 1,431 0 0
22 1983 31–21 59.6% 1,856 0 0
23 1984 14–14 50.0% #31 1,797 0 0
24 1985 9–11 45.0% #39 1,738 0 0
25 1986 14–19 42.4% #58 1,689 0 0
26 1987 19–20 48.7% #44 1,744 0 0
27 1988 8–17 32.0% #74 1,648 0 0
28 1989 12–23 34.3% #104 1,587 0 0
29 1990 3–12 20.0% #152 1,522 0 0
30 1991 1–10 9.1% #203 1,469 0 0
31 1992 0–2 0.0% #420 1,459 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eva Pfaff Donna Faber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9%
17 1989 15 10 25 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1990 5 7 12 41.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1980 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1992 8 12 20 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 8 13 38.5% 1993 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1983 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 8 18 55.6%
23 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5%
24 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
26 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 1988 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1989 9 13 22 40.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0%
29 1990 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
30 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 35 64 99 35.4% 34 47 81 42.0% 44 40 84 52.4% 42 50 92 45.7% 42 53 95 44.2% 19 29 48 39.6% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eva Pfaff Donna Faber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1496 103.9 33.3% -0.17 +0.11
16 1977 1481 98.1 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.13 1988 1532 112.2 +4 +14 40.6% -0.63 1–1 1–1 +0.30
17 1989 1675 137.0 +40 -169 -99 48.9% +0.16 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 +1.23
18 1990 1631 115.4 -7 -19 -43 43.1% -0.68 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) +0.90
19 1980 1608 120.9 -1 -3 48.0% -0.16 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.2 -0.17 1991 1593 109.9 -20 +38 +10 41.3% -0.77 9–3 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 106.2 +1.62
20 1981 1632 123.3 -25 +25 -30 45.1% -0.34 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.4 +3.33 1992 1542 119.9 +26 +37 38.0% -0.77 4–5 (44%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.56
21 1982 1776 132.7 -157 -167 -35 45.2% -0.12 7–6 (54%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.00 1993 1432 94.2 +34 20.0% -2.12 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 +0.77
22 1983 1856 145.3 -97 -97 -29 57.1% +0.32 9–8 (53%) 9–3 (75%) 108.6 +1.01
23 1984 1797 132.6 +13 -37 -33 47.5% +0.07 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.64
24 1985 1739 120.7 +36 -86 +41 46.3% -0.29 0–1 1–2 (33%) +0.71
25 1986 1690 126.2 +52 -70 +30 42.1% -0.32 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 101.8 -0.19
26 1987 1744 139.8 +26 -162 +23 49.4% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–3 (70%) 104.9 -1.04
27 1988 1648 121.4 +54 -103 +45 33.9% -1.09 5–3 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.9 +0.07
28 1989 1587 119.6 +15 +82 36.3% -1.10 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -0.75
29 1990 1522 111.5 -4 33.3% -1.19 0–6 (0%) 0–2 +0.39
30 1991 1469 118.5 +22 16.0% -2.28 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.6 -0.26
31 1992 1459 103.0 0.0% -3.00 -0.15
Career 1902 135.5 -11 -65 -2 44.1% -0.41 49–53 (48%) 36–40 (47%) 102.6 +0.12 1719 121.4 +14 -11 -44 41.2% -0.60 26–20 (57%) 13–17 (43%) 103.5 +3.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.