H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Eva Pfaff vs Elizabeth Minter H2H: 0-1

Elizabeth Minter holds a 1–0 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elizabeth Minter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elizabeth Minter won the 1987 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-1 6-2.

GER Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
AUS Age 61 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Elizabeth Minter #84 6-1 6-2 Eva Pfaff #52 Match data Feb 24, 1987* R128 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eva Pfaff #420 #17 21 1,901 155 202 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Elizabeth Minter #553 #66 12 1,638 56 75 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eva Pfaff Elizabeth Minter
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1981 6–1 85.7% 1,579 0 1
16 1977 0–1 0.0% 1,481 0 0 1982 3–1 75.0% 1,600 0 2
17 1983 4–5 44.4% 1,584 0 2
18 1984 5–5 50.0% 1,633 0 2
19 1980 12–11 52.2% 1,608 0 0 1985 6–19 24.0% 1,536 0 2
20 1981 14–19 42.4% 1,632 0 0 1986 11–14 44.0% #90 1,590 0 2
21 1982 18–22 45.0% 1,775 0 0 1987 15–17 46.9% #77 1,616 0 2
22 1983 31–21 59.6% 1,856 0 0 1988 5–10 33.3% #140 1,602 0 2
23 1984 14–14 50.0% #31 1,797 0 0 1989 1–3 25.0% #253 1,570 0 2
24 1985 9–11 45.0% #39 1,738 0 0
25 1986 14–19 42.4% #58 1,689 0 0
26 1987 19–20 48.7% #44 1,744 0 0
27 1988 8–17 32.0% #74 1,648 0 0
28 1989 12–23 34.3% #104 1,587 0 0
29 1990 3–12 20.0% #152 1,522 0 0
30 1991 1–10 9.1% #203 1,469 0 0
31 1992 0–2 0.0% #420 1,459 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eva Pfaff Elizabeth Minter
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 1 0 1 100.0%
17 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1980 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 1 5 6 16.7% 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 8 13 38.5% 1987 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
22 1983 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
23 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
26 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 1988 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1989 9 13 22 40.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0%
29 1990 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
30 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 35 64 99 35.4% 34 47 81 42.0% 44 40 84 52.4% 42 50 92 45.7% 25 32 57 43.9% 4 13 17 23.5% 16 25 41 39.0% 3 3 6 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eva Pfaff Elizabeth Minter
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1981 1580 112.1 80.0% +1.87 1–0 1–1 +0.43
16 1977 1481 98.1 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.13 1982 1600 110.0 85.7% +2.71 1–0 +0.50
17 1983 1585 104.7 +30 47.8% -0.04 2–3 (40%) +1.02
18 1984 1634 112.0 -33 -21 45.8% -0.42 3–1 (75%) 1–0 -0.08
19 1980 1608 120.9 -1 -3 48.0% -0.16 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.2 -0.17 1985 1536 102.3 +9 -55 +37 28.8% -1.46 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 98.5 +0.72
20 1981 1632 123.3 -25 +25 -30 45.1% -0.34 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.4 +3.33 1986 1591 113.4 -5 -108 +7 43.1% -0.72 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 106.1 +1.64
21 1982 1776 132.7 -157 -167 -35 45.2% -0.12 7–6 (54%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.00 1987 1616 117.1 +22 -43 46.6% -0.15 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 97.8 +2.38
22 1983 1856 145.3 -97 -97 -29 57.1% +0.32 9–8 (53%) 9–3 (75%) 108.6 +1.01 1988 1602 124.1 -12 -5 38.2% -1.38 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.8 -0.43
23 1984 1797 132.6 +13 -37 -33 47.5% +0.07 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.64 1989 1571 99.8 +3 25.0% -2.13 1–0 +0.32
24 1985 1739 120.7 +36 -86 +41 46.3% -0.29 0–1 1–2 (33%) +0.71
25 1986 1690 126.2 +52 -70 +30 42.1% -0.32 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 101.8 -0.19
26 1987 1744 139.8 +26 -162 +23 49.4% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–3 (70%) 104.9 -1.04
27 1988 1648 121.4 +54 -103 +45 33.9% -1.09 5–3 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.9 +0.07
28 1989 1587 119.6 +15 +82 36.3% -1.10 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -0.75
29 1990 1522 111.5 -4 33.3% -1.19 0–6 (0%) 0–2 +0.39
30 1991 1469 118.5 +22 16.0% -2.28 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.6 -0.26
31 1992 1459 103.0 0.0% -3.00 -0.15
Career 1902 135.5 -11 -65 -2 44.1% -0.41 49–53 (48%) 36–40 (47%) 102.6 +0.12 1638 116.9 +6 -70 -7 43.5% -0.55 22–21 (51%) 14–11 (56%) 103.3 +4.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.