H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Eva Pfaff vs Iva Budarova H2H: 0-3
Iva Budarova holds a 3–0 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Iva Budarova leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Iva Budarova won the 1986 Hilton Head second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
TCH
Age 65
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 1986* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Iva Budarova | 6-4 6-3 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
| May 25, 1983* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Iva Budarova | 6-2 6-3 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1981* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Iva Budarova | 6-2 6-1 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Pfaff | Iva Budarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |