H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Eva Pfaff vs Jo Durie H2H: 2-1
Eva Pfaff holds a 2–1 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Eva Pfaff leads 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Eva Pfaff won the 1983 Wimbledon third round 7-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 65
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1983* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Eva Pfaff | 7-6 7-5 | Jo Durie | Match data |
| Dec 8, 1982* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Eva Pfaff | 2-6 6-4 6-1 | Jo Durie | Match data |
| Jun 17, 1982* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Jo Durie | 6-4 6-2 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Pfaff | Jo Durie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 30–14 | 68.2% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 7 |
| 21 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 25–20 | 55.6% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 47–18 | 72.3% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #24 | 1,842 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #73 | 1,741 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,704 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #117 | 1,621 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,674 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #62 | 1,717 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,693 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #192 | 1,562 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #348 | 1,554 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,547 | 0 | 9 |