Eva Pfaff
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 0 | 9 | 9 | Oct 11, 1990 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 2 | 7 | 9 | Nov 7, 1987 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 25, 1991 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 8 | 8 | Jan 18, 1991 | H2H |
| Hana Mandlikova | 1 | 5 | 6 | Aug 30, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC
Eva Pfaff holds a 1–0 lead over Judith Wiesner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eva Pfaff leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Eva Pfaff won the 1986 Zurich round of 32 5-7 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | 5-7 6-3 6-1 | Judith Wiesner | Match data | Oct 9, 1986* | R32 | Zurich | WTA 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,901 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,976 | 303 | 179 | 62.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Pfaff | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,735 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #25 | 1,911 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #15 | 1,922 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,826 | 0 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Eva Pfaff | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1981 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1986 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1982 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1987 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1983 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 1988 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 18 | 10 | 28 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 1984 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1989 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 1985 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 21 | 7 | 28 | 75.0% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 25 | 1986 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1991 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 26 | 1987 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1992 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 27 | 1988 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1993 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% |
| 28 | 1989 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1994 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 29 | 1990 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1995 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 30 | 1991 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1996 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 31 | 1992 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1997 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| Career | — | 35 | 64 | 99 | 35.4% | 34 | 47 | 81 | 42.0% | 44 | 40 | 84 | 52.4% | 42 | 50 | 92 | 45.7% | — | 106 | 64 | 170 | 62.4% | 131 | 72 | 203 | 64.5% | 25 | 13 | 38 | 65.8% | 41 | 30 | 71 | 57.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Eva Pfaff | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1977 | 1481 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | 1608 | 120.9 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -3 | — | 48.0% | -0.16 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–5 (29%) | 99.2 | -0.17 | 1985 | 1492 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.09 |
| 20 | 1981 | 1632 | 123.3 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +25 | -30 | 45.1% | -0.34 | 3–6 (33%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.4 | +3.33 | 1986 | 1514 | 117.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +64 | — | 53.3% | +0.60 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.77 |
| 21 | 1982 | 1776 | 132.7 | — | — | — | — | -157 | -167 | -35 | 45.2% | -0.12 | 7–6 (54%) | 4–5 (44%) | 102.8 | -1.00 | 1987 | 1696 | 127.6 | — | — | — | — | -111 | +11 | -79 | 57.1% | +0.56 | 4–2 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | 104.5 | +2.26 |
| 22 | 1983 | 1856 | 145.3 | — | — | — | — | -97 | -97 | -29 | 57.1% | +0.32 | 9–8 (53%) | 9–3 (75%) | 108.6 | +1.01 | 1988 | 1754 | 146.4 | — | — | — | — | -139 | +74 | — | 53.7% | +0.41 | 10–7 (59%) | 4–1 (80%) | 106.3 | -0.01 |
| 23 | 1984 | 1797 | 132.6 | — | — | — | — | +13 | -37 | -33 | 47.5% | +0.07 | 5–2 (71%) | 3–4 (43%) | 101.0 | -1.64 | 1989 | 1736 | 132.1 | — | — | — | — | -75 | +91 | -114 | 61.0% | +0.74 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–2 (75%) | 100.4 | +3.28 |
| 24 | 1985 | 1739 | 120.7 | — | — | — | — | +36 | -86 | +41 | 46.3% | -0.29 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.71 | 1990 | 1846 | 152.4 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +17 | -141 | 64.7% | +1.10 | 9–6 (60%) | 10–5 (67%) | 105.5 | -0.74 |
| 25 | 1986 | 1690 | 126.2 | — | — | — | — | +52 | -70 | +30 | 42.1% | -0.32 | 6–4 (60%) | 2–3 (40%) | 101.8 | -0.19 | 1991 | 1963 | 155.9 | — | — | — | — | -24 | -50 | -187 | 61.1% | +0.73 | 9–1 (90%) | 3–4 (43%) | 108.4 | -2.10 |
| 26 | 1987 | 1744 | 139.8 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -162 | +23 | 49.4% | -0.34 | 4–5 (44%) | 7–3 (70%) | 104.9 | -1.04 | 1992 | 1912 | 147.1 | — | — | — | — | -3 | +17 | -128 | 57.7% | +0.49 | 8–2 (80%) | 5–2 (71%) | 106.2 | -0.07 |
| 27 | 1988 | 1648 | 121.4 | — | — | — | — | +54 | -103 | +45 | 33.9% | -1.09 | 5–3 (63%) | 1–5 (17%) | 99.9 | +0.07 | 1993 | 1906 | 147.9 | — | — | — | — | -21 | +50 | — | 60.4% | +0.67 | 12–7 (63%) | 5–3 (63%) | 102.1 | -1.43 |
| 28 | 1989 | 1587 | 119.6 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | +82 | 36.3% | -1.10 | 5–5 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 103.3 | -0.75 | 1994 | 1894 | 149.7 | — | — | — | — | -18 | +42 | — | 63.5% | +0.95 | 5–7 (42%) | 4–4 (50%) | 96.6 | +0.38 |
| 29 | 1990 | 1522 | 111.5 | — | — | — | — | -4 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.19 | 0–6 (0%) | 0–2 | — | +0.39 | 1995 | 1915 | 149.4 | — | — | — | — | +25 | -25 | -156 | 61.8% | +1.24 | 11–7 (61%) | 2–9 (18%) | 92.9 | -1.06 |
| 30 | 1991 | 1469 | 118.5 | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | — | 16.0% | -2.28 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.6 | -0.26 | 1996 | 1923 | 154.0 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -98 | -7 | 59.8% | +0.61 | 7–7 (50%) | 6–4 (60%) | 101.5 | -2.40 |
| 31 | 1992 | 1459 | 103.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.15 | 1997 | 1826 | 137.1 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -4 | +98 | 61.8% | +0.87 | 4–8 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 95.1 | +0.60 |
| Career | — | 1902 | 135.5 | — | — | — | — | -11 | -65 | -2 | 44.1% | -0.41 | 49–53 (48%) | 36–40 (47%) | 102.6 | +0.12 | — | 1976 | 153.6 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +18 | -79 | 60.2% | +0.76 | 84–63 (57%) | 50–36 (58%) | 106.1 | -0.13 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 0 | 9 | 9 | Oct 11, 1990 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 2 | 7 | 9 | Nov 7, 1987 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 25, 1991 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 8 | 8 | Jan 18, 1991 | H2H |
| Hana Mandlikova | 1 | 5 | 6 | Aug 30, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Novotna | 8 | 5 | 13 | Jul 28, 1996 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 11 | 11 | Oct 5, 1996 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 1 | 7 | 8 | Oct 9, 1997 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 6 | 2 | 8 | Jun 29, 1997 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 1 | 7 | 8 | Nov 18, 1996 | H2H |