H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Eva Pfaff vs Kathy Jordan H2H: 1-1
Eva Pfaff and Kathy Jordan are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kathy Jordan leads 1–0 on carpet, while Eva Pfaff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eva Pfaff won the 1984 Filderstadt fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 1984* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Eva Pfaff | 6-3 6-1 | Kathy Jordan | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1983* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kathy Jordan | 6-1 7-5 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kathy Jordan | #520 | #5 | 44 | 2,092 | 249 | 155 | 61.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Pfaff | Kathy Jordan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 1,888 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 37–21 | 63.8% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 44–22 | 66.7% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #10 | 2,022 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #12 | 1,978 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #15 | 1,910 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,875 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |