H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Eva Pfaff vs Lisa Bonder Kreiss H2H: 1-2
Lisa Bonder Kreiss holds a 2–1 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lisa Bonder Kreiss leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Eva Pfaff won the 1987 Los Angeles third round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1987* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Eva Pfaff | 7-6 6-3 | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1982* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
| Jul 15, 1982* | Monte Carlo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-2 6-3 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | — | — | — | 1,928 | 148 | 131 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Eva Pfaff | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 28–15 | 65.1% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,885 | 0 | 5 |
| 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 31–19 | 62.0% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 5 |
| 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 |
| 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 5 |
| 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 5 |
| 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 5 |
| 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 5 |
| 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 5 |
| 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 5 |
| 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |