H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Eva Pfaff vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 2-0
Eva Pfaff holds a 2–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Eva Pfaff leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eva Pfaff won the 1989 Phoenix third round 6-2 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 1989* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Eva Pfaff | 6-2 1-6 6-3 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Oct 30, 1986* | Indianapolis Indoors | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Eva Pfaff | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Eva Pfaff | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |