H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Eva Pfaff vs Mary Lou Piatek H2H: 0-2

Mary Lou Piatek holds a 2–0 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mary Lou Piatek leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Lou Piatek won the 1988 Dallas fourth round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Eva Pfaff
GER Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Mary Lou Piatek

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 12, 1988* Dallas WTA 250 R16 Hard Mary Lou Piatek 7-5 6-1 Eva Pfaff #52 Match data
Jun 17, 1981* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Mary Lou Piatek 7-6 6-4 Eva Pfaff Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Eva Pfaff #420 #17 21 1,902 155 202 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mary Lou Piatek — — — 1,936 153 206 42.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Eva Pfaff Mary Lou Piatek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
1980 12–11 52.2% — 1,609 0 0 1979 3–5 37.5% — 1,546 0 0
1981 14–19 42.4% — 1,643 0 0 1980 16–12 57.1% — 1,737 0 0
1982 18–22 45.0% — 1,777 0 0 1981 30–22 57.7% — 1,873 0 1
1983 31–21 59.6% — 1,856 0 0 1982 18–21 46.2% — 1,792 0 1
1984 14–14 50.0% #31 1,797 0 0 1983 12–20 37.5% — 1,721 0 1
1985 9–11 45.0% #39 1,740 0 0 1984 18–20 47.4% — 1,703 0 2
1986 14–19 42.4% #58 1,689 0 0 1985 14–18 43.8% — 1,678 0 2
1987 19–20 48.7% #44 1,744 0 0 1986 8–15 34.8% — 1,619 0 2
1988 8–17 32.0% #74 1,649 0 0 1987 6–12 33.3% — 1,594 0 2
1989 12–23 34.3% #104 1,586 0 0 1988 6–16 27.3% — 1,542 0 2
1990 3–12 20.0% #152 1,521 0 0 1989 7–15 31.8% — 1,593 0 2
1991 1–10 9.1% #203 1,469 0 0 1990 8–11 42.1% — 1,612 0 2
1992 0–2 0.0% #420 1,459 0 0 1991 5–8 38.5% — 1,630 0 2
— — — — — — — 1992 1–8 11.1% — 1,560 0 2
— — — — — — — 1993 1–2 33.3% — 1,555 0 2