H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Eva Pfaff vs Nicole Bradtke H2H: 0-2
Nicole Bradtke holds a 2–0 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicole Bradtke leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Bradtke won the 1990 Indian Wells second round 1-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 1990* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nicole Bradtke | 1-6 6-3 6-3 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
| Aug 21, 1989 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Nicole Bradtke | 6-2 6-4 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicole Bradtke | #394 | #24 | 256 | 1,868 | 181 | 162 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Pfaff | Nicole Bradtke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #123 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #78 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #61 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #45 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #26 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #394 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |