H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Eva Pfaff vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 1-0
Eva Pfaff holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Hy Boulais in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eva Pfaff leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Eva Pfaff won the 1983 Dallas third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 60
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 1983* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Eva Pfaff | 6-2 6-4 | Patricia Hy Boulais | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,907 | 140 | 163 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Pfaff | Patricia Hy Boulais | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |