H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Eva Pfaff vs Pilar Vasquez H2H: 2-0
Eva Pfaff holds a 2–0 lead over Pilar Vasquez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Eva Pfaff leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eva Pfaff won the 1987 Boca Raton second round 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
PER
Age 63
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 1987* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Eva Pfaff | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
| May 30, 1984* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Eva Pfaff | 6-4 6-7(2) 6-4 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Pfaff | Pilar Vasquez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |