H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Eva Pfaff vs Raffaella Reggi Concato H2H: 0-4
Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 4–0 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1989 Key Biscayne fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 1989* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-3 6-3 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1986* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 7-5 6-0 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
| Aug 5, 1985 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-3 6-1 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
| Aug 24, 1983* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-3 6-2 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Pfaff | Raffaella Reggi Concato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |