H2H data updated: 2026-10-26 00:00 UTC

Eva Pfaff vs Sandy Collins H2H: 2-1

Eva Pfaff holds a 2–1 lead over Sandy Collins in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Eva Pfaff leads 1–0 on carpet, while Sandy Collins leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Eva Pfaff won the 1986 Birmingham round of 64 5-7 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Eva Pfaff
GER Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Sandy Collins
USA Age 68

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eva Pfaff #39 5-7 6-1 6-2 Sandy Collins Match data Jun 11, 1986* R64 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Eva Pfaff 6-2 6-3 Sandy Collins Match data Oct 28, 1983* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 500 Carpet
Sandy Collins 6-4 6-3 Eva Pfaff Match data May 14, 1981* R32 Lugano WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eva Pfaff — #17 21 1,902 155 202 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sandy Collins — — — 1,824 90 152 37.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eva Pfaff Sandy Collins
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1973 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
16 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1980 12–11 52.2% — 1,608 0 0 1978 7–7 50.0% — 1,541 0 0
20 1981 14–19 42.4% — 1,632 0 0 1979 2–7 22.2% — 1,498 0 0
21 1982 18–22 45.0% — 1,776 0 0 1980 10–12 45.5% — 1,632 0 0
22 1983 31–21 59.6% — 1,857 0 0 1981 25–20 55.6% — 1,787 0 0
23 1984 14–14 50.0% #31 1,797 0 0 1982 14–21 40.0% — 1,734 0 0
24 1985 9–11 45.0% — 1,739 0 0 1983 13–20 39.4% — 1,684 0 0
25 1986 14–19 42.4% #58 1,690 0 0 1984 9–18 33.3% — 1,600 0 0
26 1987 19–20 48.7% #44 1,744 0 0 1985 1–9 10.0% — 1,508 0 0
27 1988 8–17 32.0% #74 1,648 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,500 0 0
28 1989 12–23 34.3% #104 1,587 0 0 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,453 0 0
29 1990 3–12 20.0% #152 1,522 0 0 1988 3–5 37.5% — 1,491 0 0
30 1991 1–10 9.1% #203 1,469 0 0 1989 2–8 20.0% — 1,473 0 0
31 1992 0–2 0.0% #420 1,459 0 0 1990 1–9 10.0% — 1,421 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1991 1–5 16.7% — 1,406 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 1992 1–2 33.3% — 1,413 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,407 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 1994 0–2 0.0% — 1,393 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eva Pfaff Sandy Collins
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1978 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 8 13 38.5% 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
22 1983 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 1981 4 5 9 44.4% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
23 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 12 19 36.8%
24 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1983 5 6 11 45.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1984 7 6 13 53.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1985 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1988 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1986 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 1989 9 13 22 40.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 1987 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 1990 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1988 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 64 99 35.4% 34 47 81 42.0% 44 40 84 52.4% 42 50 92 45.7% — 34 56 90 37.8% 20 32 52 38.5% 6 24 30 20.0% 26 38 64 40.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eva Pfaff Sandy Collins
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1497 99.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.62
16 1977 1481 98.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 1608 121.1 — — — — 0 -3 — 48.0% -0.16 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.2 -0.01 1978 1541 118.0 — — — — +85 — — 56.3% +0.66 0–4 (0%) — — +1.24
20 1981 1633 123.6 — — — — -26 +24 -31 45.1% -0.34 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.5 +3.20 1979 1498 107.8 — — — — — -8 — 30.0% -0.55 0–2 0–1 — +1.31
21 1982 1776 132.9 — — — — -155 -166 -35 45.2% -0.12 7–6 (54%) 4–5 (44%) 102.9 -0.97 1980 1632 129.0 — — — — +7 — — 48.9% +0.22 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 101.5 -0.07
22 1983 1857 145.5 — — — — -98 -98 -30 57.1% +0.32 9–8 (53%) 9–3 (75%) 108.7 +0.77 1981 1787 138.1 — — — — -48 -82 -188 52.6% -0.04 6–3 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 104.5 -1.55
23 1984 1798 132.8 — — — — +13 -37 -34 47.5% +0.07 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.40 1982 1734 126.6 — — — — -17 -44 — 38.7% -0.91 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 103.2 -0.37
24 1985 1740 120.9 — — — — +36 -87 +40 46.3% -0.29 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.72 1983 1685 124.3 — — — — +34 -29 -111 40.8% -0.63 2–3 (40%) 1–5 (17%) 95.5 -0.09
25 1986 1690 126.3 — — — — +52 -69 +30 42.1% -0.32 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 101.8 -0.11 1984 1601 117.8 — — — — +112 -8 -91 34.4% -0.97 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 -0.22
26 1987 1745 139.9 — — — — +26 -163 +22 49.4% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–3 (70%) 104.9 -1.01 1985 1508 99.3 — — — — +102 — — 18.2% -2.36 0–2 1–0 — +0.69
27 1988 1649 121.4 — — — — +54 -104 +45 33.9% -1.09 5–3 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.9 -0.01 1986 1500 101.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — -0.03
28 1989 1588 119.7 — — — — +15 — +82 36.3% -1.10 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -0.64 1987 1454 94.2 — — — — — — — 11.1% -2.56 0–1 — — +0.23
29 1990 1522 111.6 — — — — -3 — — 33.3% -1.19 0–6 (0%) 0–2 — +0.39 1988 1491 114.4 — — — — +85 — — 42.1% -0.63 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.4 -0.02
30 1991 1470 118.6 — — — — +22 — — 16.0% -2.28 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.6 -0.26 1989 1473 103.5 — — — — +56 — — 23.8% -1.71 0–1 2–0 — +0.43
31 1992 1460 103.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 1990 1422 95.6 — — — — +39 +112 — 17.4% -2.65 1–2 (33%) — — +0.17
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1406 104.6 — — — — +39 — — 21.4% -2.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.16
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1413 104.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.18
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1408 95.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.07
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1394 103.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–2 1–1 — -0.05
Career — 1903 135.7 — — — — -11 -66 -3 44.1% -0.41 49–53 (48%) 36–40 (47%) 102.6 +0.24 — 1825 126.0 — — — — +28 -36 -128 39.2% -0.75 24–34 (41%) 15–24 (38%) 92.7 +1.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.