H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Eva Pfaff vs Terry Holladay H2H: 1-0

Eva Pfaff holds a 1–0 lead over Terry Holladay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eva Pfaff leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Eva Pfaff won the 1987 Brisbane International round of 64 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Eva Pfaff
GER Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Terry Holladay
USA Age 70 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eva Pfaff #58 6-0 6-3 Terry Holladay #103 Match data Dec 31, 1986* R64 Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eva Pfaff — #17 21 1,902 155 202 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Terry Holladay — #39 7 1,945 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eva Pfaff Terry Holladay
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
16 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 1972 2–3 40.0% — 1,473 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1973 4–2 66.7% — 1,507 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1974 12–17 41.4% — 1,563 0 0
19 1980 12–11 52.2% — 1,608 0 0 1975 32–23 58.2% — 1,758 0 0
20 1981 14–19 42.4% — 1,632 0 0 1976 28–20 58.3% — 1,896 0 1
21 1982 18–22 45.0% — 1,776 0 0 1977 15–15 50.0% — 1,943 0 1
22 1983 31–21 59.6% — 1,857 0 0 1978 2–8 20.0% — 1,867 0 1
23 1984 14–14 50.0% #31 1,797 0 0 1979 17–18 48.6% — 1,832 0 1
24 1985 9–11 45.0% — 1,739 0 0 1980 25–21 54.3% — 1,826 0 1
25 1986 14–19 42.4% #58 1,690 0 0 1981 4–12 25.0% — 1,673 0 1
26 1987 19–20 48.7% #44 1,744 0 0 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,639 0 1
27 1988 8–17 32.0% #74 1,648 0 0 1983 9–8 52.9% — 1,679 0 1
28 1989 12–23 34.3% #104 1,587 0 0 1984 15–16 48.4% #50 1,677 0 1
29 1990 3–12 20.0% #152 1,522 0 0 1985 9–16 36.0% — 1,609 0 1
30 1991 1–10 9.1% #203 1,469 0 0 1986 5–8 38.5% #103 1,628 0 1
31 1992 0–2 0.0% #420 1,459 0 0 1987 0–9 0.0% #315 1,512 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eva Pfaff Terry Holladay
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1972 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 1980 — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
20 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1976 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 9 23 60.9%
21 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 8 13 38.5% 1977 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
22 1983 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 1978 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 1979 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 9 14 35.7%
24 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 12 23 47.8%
25 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1988 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1989 9 13 22 40.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 1984 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 1990 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1985 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 35 64 99 35.4% 34 47 81 42.0% 44 40 84 52.4% 42 50 92 45.7% — 64 69 133 48.1% 23 27 50 46.0% 42 39 81 51.9% 50 64 114 43.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eva Pfaff Terry Holladay
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1489 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.08
16 1977 1481 98.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.33 1972 1473 99.7 — — — — +72 — — 45.5% -0.27 0–1 0–1 — +1.13
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1507 105.7 — — — — +97 — — 66.7% +1.08 — 1–0 — +1.72
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1564 120.1 — — — — -36 +43 — 44.6% -0.46 2–5 (29%) 3–1 (75%) 97.9 +0.85
19 1980 1608 121.1 — — — — 0 -3 — 48.0% -0.16 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.2 -0.01 1975 1759 130.6 — — — — -20 -115 -113 57.1% +0.64 10–10 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 100.9 +2.59
20 1981 1633 123.6 — — — — -26 +24 -31 45.1% -0.34 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.5 +3.20 1976 1897 148.1 — — — — +31 -249 -165 59.2% +0.31 4–4 (50%) 8–4 (67%) 105.5 -3.36
21 1982 1776 132.9 — — — — -155 -166 -35 45.2% -0.12 7–6 (54%) 4–5 (44%) 102.9 -0.97 1977 1943 148.6 — — — — -3 — -137 51.5% +0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.6 -5.31
22 1983 1857 145.5 — — — — -98 -98 -30 57.1% +0.32 9–8 (53%) 9–3 (75%) 108.7 +0.77 1978 1867 129.3 — — — — -10 — -63 37.5% -0.92 1–5 (17%) 1–3 (25%) 94.0 -1.91
23 1984 1798 132.8 — — — — +13 -37 -34 47.5% +0.07 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.40 1979 1833 140.5 — — — — -1 — — 49.3% +0.03 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 98.2 -0.76
24 1985 1740 120.9 — — — — +36 -87 +40 46.3% -0.29 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.72 1980 1827 148.3 — — — — +10 — -7 52.0% +0.20 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 -3.51
25 1986 1690 126.3 — — — — +52 -69 +30 42.1% -0.32 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 101.8 -0.11 1981 1674 108.7 — — — — +74 — +80 30.3% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.08
26 1987 1745 139.9 — — — — +26 -163 +22 49.4% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–3 (70%) 104.9 -1.01 1982 1640 94.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.01
27 1988 1649 121.4 — — — — +54 -104 +45 33.9% -1.09 5–3 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.9 -0.01 1983 1680 131.9 — — — — +15 — +102 57.1% +0.28 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +1.29
28 1989 1588 119.7 — — — — +15 — +82 36.3% -1.10 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -0.64 1984 1678 119.9 — — — — +9 — +70 46.8% -0.44 9–6 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 100.8 +1.92
29 1990 1522 111.6 — — — — -3 — — 33.3% -1.19 0–6 (0%) 0–2 — +0.39 1985 1609 119.2 — — — — +25 — +87 40.7% -0.75 4–5 (44%) 1–5 (17%) 98.1 +0.39
30 1991 1470 118.6 — — — — +22 — — 16.0% -2.28 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.6 -0.26 1986 1629 114.9 — — — — -5 — +91 40.7% -0.70 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 +0.22
31 1992 1460 103.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 1987 1512 88.0 — — — — +45 — +94 5.3% -3.53 0–1 0–1 — +0.17
Career — 1903 135.7 — — — — -11 -66 -3 44.1% -0.41 49–53 (48%) 36–40 (47%) 102.6 +0.24 — 1946 138.7 — — — — +11 -62 -19 48.8% -0.14 51–55 (48%) 33–39 (46%) 98.8 -1.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.