Eva Pfaff
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 0 | 9 | 9 | Oct 11, 1990 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 2 | 7 | 9 | Nov 7, 1987 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 25, 1991 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 8 | 8 | Jan 18, 1991 | H2H |
| Hana Mandlikova | 1 | 5 | 6 | Aug 30, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Eva Pfaff vs Tina Mochizuki H2H: 1-0
Eva Pfaff holds a 1–0 lead over Tina Mochizuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eva Pfaff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eva Pfaff won the 1987 Canadian Open round of 32 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
USA
Age 73
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | 6-3 7-6 | Tina Mochizuki | Match data | Aug 20, 1987* | R32 | Canadian Open | WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,901 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tina Mochizuki | — | — | — | 1,679 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Pfaff | Tina Mochizuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 13–7 | 65.0% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 5–17 | 22.7% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8–25 | 24.2% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,411 | 0 | 1 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Eva Pfaff | Tina Mochizuki | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1972 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1981 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1973 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1982 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1974 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1983 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1984 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1985 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1986 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1987 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1980 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1989 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1982 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 30 | 1991 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1983 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1984 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 35 | 64 | 99 | 35.4% | 34 | 47 | 81 | 42.0% | 44 | 40 | 84 | 52.4% | 42 | 50 | 92 | 45.7% | — | 36 | 62 | 98 | 36.7% | 9 | 27 | 36 | 25.0% | 12 | 21 | 33 | 36.4% | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Eva Pfaff | Tina Mochizuki | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1484 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.09 |
| 16 | 1977 | 1481 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.13 | 1969 | 1450 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.60 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.55 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1425 | 82.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.75 | — | — | — | +0.38 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1446 | 105.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +83 | — | 41.7% | -1.67 | 1–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.16 |
| 19 | 1980 | 1608 | 120.9 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -3 | — | 48.0% | -0.16 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–5 (29%) | 99.2 | -0.17 | 1972 | 1432 | 89.9 | — | — | — | — | +20 | +60 | — | 35.3% | -1.53 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +1.65 |
| 20 | 1981 | 1632 | 123.3 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +25 | -30 | 45.1% | -0.34 | 3–6 (33%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.4 | +3.33 | 1973 | 1464 | 107.3 | — | — | — | — | +59 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.55 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.92 |
| 21 | 1982 | 1776 | 132.7 | — | — | — | — | -157 | -167 | -35 | 45.2% | -0.12 | 7–6 (54%) | 4–5 (44%) | 102.8 | -1.00 | 1974 | 1453 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.16 |
| 22 | 1983 | 1856 | 145.3 | — | — | — | — | -97 | -97 | -29 | 57.1% | +0.32 | 9–8 (53%) | 9–3 (75%) | 108.6 | +1.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1984 | 1797 | 132.6 | — | — | — | — | +13 | -37 | -33 | 47.5% | +0.07 | 5–2 (71%) | 3–4 (43%) | 101.0 | -1.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1985 | 1739 | 120.7 | — | — | — | — | +36 | -86 | +41 | 46.3% | -0.29 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1986 | 1690 | 126.2 | — | — | — | — | +52 | -70 | +30 | 42.1% | -0.32 | 6–4 (60%) | 2–3 (40%) | 101.8 | -0.19 | 1978 | 1438 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.06 |
| 26 | 1987 | 1744 | 139.8 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -162 | +23 | 49.4% | -0.34 | 4–5 (44%) | 7–3 (70%) | 104.9 | -1.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 1648 | 121.4 | — | — | — | — | +54 | -103 | +45 | 33.9% | -1.09 | 5–3 (63%) | 1–5 (17%) | 99.9 | +0.07 | 1980 | 1552 | 114.3 | — | — | — | — | +26 | — | — | 58.6% | +0.64 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.3 | +2.50 |
| 28 | 1989 | 1587 | 119.6 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | +82 | 36.3% | -1.10 | 5–5 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 103.3 | -0.75 | 1981 | 1612 | 122.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 61.2% | +0.75 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.0 | -0.50 |
| 29 | 1990 | 1522 | 111.5 | — | — | — | — | -4 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.19 | 0–6 (0%) | 0–2 | — | +0.39 | 1982 | 1630 | 109.6 | — | — | — | — | -12 | — | — | 57.9% | +0.47 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +1.68 |
| 30 | 1991 | 1469 | 118.5 | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | — | 16.0% | -2.28 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.6 | -0.26 | 1983 | 1603 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -38 | +4 | 45.0% | -0.18 | 7–5 (58%) | 2–5 (29%) | 99.8 | +2.25 |
| 31 | 1992 | 1459 | 103.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.15 | 1984 | 1454 | 106.3 | — | — | — | — | +20 | +74 | +143 | 34.6% | -0.73 | 0–8 (0%) | 1–5 (17%) | 87.8 | +1.89 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1476 | 106.7 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -8 | +73 | 27.8% | -1.78 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | 100.1 | +0.99 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1522 | 112.2 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -72 | +33 | 36.4% | -1.26 | 4–2 (67%) | 6–3 (67%) | 106.4 | +1.60 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1455 | 108.3 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -45 | +65 | 27.4% | -1.58 | 3–6 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 99.7 | +0.36 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1412 | 109.7 | — | — | — | — | -11 | — | +90 | 25.8% | -1.32 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–2 (33%) | 96.9 | +0.19 |
| Career | — | 1902 | 135.5 | — | — | — | — | -11 | -65 | -2 | 44.1% | -0.41 | 49–53 (48%) | 36–40 (47%) | 102.6 | +0.12 | — | 1680 | 112.0 | — | — | — | — | +21 | +8 | +60 | 40.2% | -0.71 | 31–39 (44%) | 20–25 (44%) | 98.4 | +6.88 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Tina Mochizuki
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camille Benjamin | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jul 21, 1988 | H2H |
| Alycia Moulton | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 14, 1985 | H2H |
| Wendy Turnbull | 0 | 3 | 3 | Dec 31, 1987 | H2H |
| Vicki Nelson | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 30, 1987 | H2H |
| Bonnie Gadusek | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 19, 1987 | H2H |