H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Eva Pfaff vs Tina Mochizuki H2H: 1-0
Eva Pfaff holds a 1–0 lead over Tina Mochizuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eva Pfaff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eva Pfaff won the 1987 Toronto third round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 73
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1987 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Eva Pfaff | 6-3 7-6 | Tina Mochizuki | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tina Mochizuki | — | — | — | 1,684 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Pfaff | Tina Mochizuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 13–7 | 65.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 5–17 | 22.7% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8–25 | 24.2% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,413 | 0 | 1 |