H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Eva Pfaff vs Tracy Austin H2H: 0-3

Tracy Austin holds a 3–0 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tracy Austin leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tracy Austin won the 1982 Brisbane International round of 32 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Eva Pfaff
GER Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Tracy Austin
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tracy Austin 6-1 6-2 Eva Pfaff Match data Nov 18, 1982* R32 Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass
Tracy Austin 6-2 6-4 Eva Pfaff Match data May 27, 1982* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Tracy Austin 6-2 6-1 Eva Pfaff Match data Oct 30, 1981* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eva Pfaff #420 #17 21 1,901 155 202 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tracy Austin #81 #1 19 2,502 339 88 79.4% 2 0 1 5 20 28

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eva Pfaff Tracy Austin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1977 14–8 63.6% — 1,780 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1978 43–13 76.8% #6 2,057 0 2
16 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 1979 73–12 85.9% #3 2,431 1 9
17 — — — — — — — 1980 81–10 89.0% #2 2,450 1 19
18 — — — — — — — 1981 56–7 88.9% #2 2,442 2 27
19 1980 12–11 52.2% — 1,608 0 0 1982 35–12 74.5% #4 2,262 2 28
20 1981 14–19 42.4% — 1,632 0 0 1983 24–8 75.0% #9 2,185 2 28
21 1982 18–22 45.0% — 1,775 0 0 1984 2–2 50.0% #27 2,136 2 28
22 1983 31–21 59.6% — 1,856 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1984 14–14 50.0% #31 1,797 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1985 9–11 45.0% #39 1,738 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1986 14–19 42.4% #58 1,689 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1987 19–20 48.7% #44 1,744 0 0 1989 0–2 0.0% — 2,078 2 28
27 1988 8–17 32.0% #74 1,648 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1989 12–23 34.3% #104 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1990 3–12 20.0% #152 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1991 1–10 9.1% #203 1,469 0 0 1993 6–6 50.0% #117 1,970 2 28
31 1992 0–2 0.0% #420 1,459 0 0 1994 5–8 38.5% #81 1,850 2 28

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eva Pfaff Tracy Austin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 4 2 6 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 13 3 16 81.3%
16 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 22 4 26 84.6% 10 0 10 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 33 6 39 84.6%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 18 4 22 81.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 11 1 12 91.7% 44 4 48 91.7%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 20 4 24 83.3%
19 1980 — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1982 11 2 13 84.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 6 21 71.4%
20 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1983 — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 12 5 17 70.6%
21 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 8 13 38.5% 1984 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1983 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1988 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 9 13 22 40.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
31 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 35 64 99 35.4% 34 47 81 42.0% 44 40 84 52.4% 42 50 92 45.7% — 101 26 127 79.5% 44 13 57 77.2% 49 14 63 77.8% 141 34 175 80.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eva Pfaff Tracy Austin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1780 149.9 — — — — -85 -30 — 59.1% +0.55 2–0 1–0 — -1.15
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 2057 163.2 — — — — +12 -252 -337 72.6% +1.96 6–3 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 108.8 -0.48
16 1977 1481 98.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.13 1979 2431 178.8 — — — — +6 -369 -545 80.9% +2.33 13–3 (81%) 6–3 (67%) 110.9 -9.11
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2451 179.3 — — — — +144 -317 -403 85.3% +3.11 12–3 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 104.4 -3.63
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 2442 175.7 — — — — +118 -334 -333 84.6% +2.88 7–3 (70%) 7–4 (64%) 101.7 -3.49
19 1980 1608 120.9 — — — — -1 -3 — 48.0% -0.16 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.2 -0.17 1982 2263 167.1 — — — — +182 -144 -203 75.5% +2.05 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 94.0 -1.08
20 1981 1632 123.3 — — — — -25 +25 -30 45.1% -0.34 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.4 +3.33 1983 2186 159.6 — — — — +138 -57 -80 76.5% +1.88 2–4 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 94.9 -1.73
21 1982 1776 132.7 — — — — -157 -167 -35 45.2% -0.12 7–6 (54%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.00 1984 2137 114.9 — — — — +108 — — 50.0% +0.13 — — — +0.03
22 1983 1856 145.3 — — — — -97 -97 -29 57.1% +0.32 9–8 (53%) 9–3 (75%) 108.6 +1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1984 1797 132.6 — — — — +13 -37 -33 47.5% +0.07 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1985 1739 120.7 — — — — +36 -86 +41 46.3% -0.29 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1986 1690 126.2 — — — — +52 -70 +30 42.1% -0.32 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 101.8 -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1987 1744 139.8 — — — — +26 -162 +23 49.4% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–3 (70%) 104.9 -1.04 1989 2079 101.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.04
27 1988 1648 121.4 — — — — +54 -103 +45 33.9% -1.09 5–3 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.9 +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 1587 119.6 — — — — +15 — +82 36.3% -1.10 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1522 111.5 — — — — -4 — — 33.3% -1.19 0–6 (0%) 0–2 — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1469 118.5 — — — — +22 — — 16.0% -2.28 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.6 -0.26 1993 1970 123.3 — — — — +25 — — 46.4% -0.97 3–1 (75%) — — -0.65
31 1992 1459 103.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 1994 1851 118.5 — — — — +76 +127 — 36.7% -0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -1.54
Career — 1902 135.5 — — — — -11 -65 -2 44.1% -0.41 49–53 (48%) 36–40 (47%) 102.6 +0.12 — 2502 175.2 — — — — +84 -168 -342 76.2% +2.12 52–25 (68%) 33–14 (70%) 109.1 -5.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.