H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Eva Pfaff vs Tracy Austin H2H: 0-3
Tracy Austin holds a 3–0 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tracy Austin leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tracy Austin won the 1982 Brisbane third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 1982* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Tracy Austin | 6-1 6-2 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
| May 27, 1982* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Tracy Austin | 6-2 6-4 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
| Oct 30, 1981* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Tracy Austin | 6-2 6-1 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tracy Austin | #81 | #4 | 19 | 2,484 | 339 | 88 | 79.4% | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 28 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Pfaff | Tracy Austin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 43–13 | 76.8% | — | 2,055 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 73–12 | 85.9% | — | 2,412 | 1 | 9 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 81–10 | 89.0% | — | 2,383 | 1 | 19 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 56–7 | 88.9% | — | 2,406 | 2 | 27 |
| 19 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 35–12 | 74.5% | — | 2,224 | 2 | 28 |
| 20 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 24–8 | 75.0% | — | 2,162 | 2 | 28 |
| 21 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #27 | 2,115 | 2 | 28 |
| 22 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 2,057 | 2 | 28 |
| 27 | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #117 | 1,955 | 2 | 28 |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,840 | 2 | 28 |