H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Eva Pfaff vs Tracy Austin H2H: 0-3

Tracy Austin holds a 3–0 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tracy Austin leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tracy Austin won the 1982 Brisbane International round of 32 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Eva Pfaff
GER Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Tracy Austin
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tracy Austin 6-1 6-2 Eva Pfaff Match data Nov 18, 1982* R32 Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass
Tracy Austin 6-2 6-4 Eva Pfaff Match data May 27, 1982* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Tracy Austin 6-2 6-1 Eva Pfaff Match data Oct 30, 1981* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eva Pfaff — #17 21 1,902 155 202 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tracy Austin — #1 19 2,522 341 88 79.5% 2 0 1 12 15 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eva Pfaff Tracy Austin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1977 14–8 63.6% — 1,780 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1978 44–13 77.2% #6 2,087 0 3
16 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 1979 73–12 85.9% #3 2,436 1 10
17 — — — — — — — 1980 82–10 89.1% #2 2,463 1 21
18 — — — — — — — 1981 56–7 88.9% #2 2,449 2 29
19 1980 12–11 52.2% — 1,608 0 0 1982 35–12 74.5% #4 2,267 2 30
20 1981 14–19 42.4% — 1,632 0 0 1983 24–8 75.0% #9 2,189 2 30
21 1982 18–22 45.0% — 1,776 0 0 1984 2–2 50.0% — 2,139 2 30
22 1983 31–21 59.6% — 1,857 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1984 14–14 50.0% #31 1,797 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1985 9–11 45.0% — 1,739 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1986 14–19 42.4% #58 1,690 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1987 19–20 48.7% #44 1,744 0 0 1989 0–2 0.0% — 2,081 2 30
27 1988 8–17 32.0% #74 1,648 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1989 12–23 34.3% #104 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1990 3–12 20.0% #152 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1991 1–10 9.1% #203 1,469 0 0 1993 6–6 50.0% #117 1,972 2 30
31 1992 0–2 0.0% #420 1,459 0 0 1994 5–8 38.5% — 1,852 2 30

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eva Pfaff Tracy Austin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 4 2 6 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 13 3 16 81.3%
16 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 22 4 26 84.6% 10 0 10 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 33 6 39 84.6%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 8 1 9 88.9% 11 1 12 91.7% 44 4 48 91.7%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 20 4 24 83.3%
19 1980 — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1982 11 2 13 84.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 6 21 71.4%
20 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1983 — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 12 5 17 70.6%
21 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 8 13 38.5% 1984 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1983 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1988 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 9 13 22 40.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
31 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 35 64 99 35.4% 34 47 81 42.0% 44 40 84 52.4% 42 50 92 45.7% — 102 26 128 79.7% 44 13 57 77.2% 49 14 63 77.8% 141 34 175 80.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eva Pfaff Tracy Austin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1781 150.1 — — — — -85 -31 — 59.1% +0.55 2–0 1–0 — -1.01
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 2087 165.9 — — — — -15 -282 -367 73.1% +2.01 6–3 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 108.9 -2.13
16 1977 1481 98.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.33 1979 2436 178.9 — — — — +5 -373 -551 80.9% +2.33 13–3 (81%) 6–3 (67%) 110.9 -8.70
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2464 180.2 — — — — +151 -327 -415 85.5% +3.11 12–3 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -4.53
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 2450 175.9 — — — — +119 -339 -340 84.6% +2.88 7–3 (70%) 7–4 (64%) 101.5 -3.61
19 1980 1608 121.1 — — — — 0 -3 — 48.0% -0.16 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.2 -0.01 1982 2267 167.2 — — — — +185 -147 -207 75.5% +2.05 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 94.0 -1.41
20 1981 1633 123.6 — — — — -26 +24 -31 45.1% -0.34 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.5 +3.20 1983 2189 159.8 — — — — +140 -59 -83 76.5% +1.88 2–4 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 94.9 -1.86
21 1982 1776 132.9 — — — — -155 -166 -35 45.2% -0.12 7–6 (54%) 4–5 (44%) 102.9 -0.97 1984 2140 115.0 — — — — +111 — — 50.0% +0.13 — — — +0.03
22 1983 1857 145.5 — — — — -98 -98 -30 57.1% +0.32 9–8 (53%) 9–3 (75%) 108.7 +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1984 1798 132.8 — — — — +13 -37 -34 47.5% +0.07 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1985 1740 120.9 — — — — +36 -87 +40 46.3% -0.29 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1986 1690 126.3 — — — — +52 -69 +30 42.1% -0.32 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 101.8 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1987 1745 139.9 — — — — +26 -163 +22 49.4% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–3 (70%) 104.9 -1.01 1989 2082 101.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05
27 1988 1649 121.4 — — — — +54 -104 +45 33.9% -1.09 5–3 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.9 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 1588 119.7 — — — — +15 — +82 36.3% -1.10 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1522 111.6 — — — — -3 — — 33.3% -1.19 0–6 (0%) 0–2 — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1470 118.6 — — — — +22 — — 16.0% -2.28 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.6 -0.26 1993 1973 123.4 — — — — +28 — — 46.4% -0.97 3–1 (75%) — — -0.65
31 1992 1460 103.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 1994 1852 118.5 — — — — +78 +126 — 36.7% -0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -1.54
Career — 1903 135.7 — — — — -11 -66 -3 44.1% -0.41 49–53 (48%) 36–40 (47%) 102.6 +0.24 — 2522 175.8 — — — — +83 -173 -353 76.3% +2.13 52–25 (68%) 33–14 (70%) 108.9 -5.99

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.