H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Eva Sviglerova vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 1-1
Eva Sviglerova and Mercedes Paz are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mercedes Paz leads 1–0 on clay, while Eva Sviglerova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mercedes Paz won the 1991 Berlin second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 1991* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Mercedes Paz | 6-4 6-4 | Eva Sviglerova | Match data |
| Feb 2, 1991* | Auckland | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Eva Sviglerova | 6-2 6-3 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Sviglerova | #401 | #33 | 27 | 1,712 | 42 | 62 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Sviglerova | Mercedes Paz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1989 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #89 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #40 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1992 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #171 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #399 | 1,502 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |