H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Evgeniya Rodina vs Carina Witthoeft H2H: 1-2
Carina Witthoeft holds a 2–1 lead over Evgeniya Rodina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Carina Witthoeft leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Evgeniya Rodina won the 2018 Gstaad third round 6-7(3) 6-4 7-6(11).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2018* | Gstaad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Evgeniya Rodina | 6-7(3) 6-4 7-6(11) | Carina Witthoeft | Match data |
| Oct 19, 2017* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Carina Witthoeft | 6-2 6-3 | Evgeniya Rodina | Match data |
| Aug 20, 2016 | New Haven | WTA 500 | Q2 | Hard | Evgeniya Rodina | 6-3 5-4 | Carina Witthoeft | Match data |
| May 22, 2015* | Nuremberg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Carina Witthoeft | 6-1 6-2 | Evgeniya Rodina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evgeniya Rodina | #1,376 | #67 | 882 | 1,663 | 74 | 119 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carina Witthoeft | #1,212 | #48 | 1,093 | 1,745 | 49 | 69 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Evgeniya Rodina | Carina Witthoeft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #320 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #64 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #107 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #106 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #370 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #170 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #295 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #438 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #443 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |