H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Evgeniya Rodina vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 1-0
Evgeniya Rodina holds a 1–0 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Evgeniya Rodina leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Evgeniya Rodina won the 2005 Tashkent third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
154 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2005* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Evgeniya Rodina | 6-2 6-4 | Tatiana Panova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evgeniya Rodina | #1,376 | #67 | 882 | 1,663 | 74 | 119 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Evgeniya Rodina | Tatiana Panova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #320 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #107 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #106 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #370 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2019 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #295 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #438 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2023 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #443 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |