H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Evonne Goolagong vs Ann Jones H2H: 0-3
Ann Jones holds a 3–0 lead over Evonne Goolagong in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ann Jones leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ann Jones won the 1970 Fulham semifinal 3-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
Age 87
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 1970* | Fulham | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Ann Jones | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | Evonne Goolagong | Match data |
| Apr 25, 1970* | Sutton | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Ann Jones | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Evonne Goolagong | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1969* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Ann Jones | 6-2 6-1 | Evonne Goolagong | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evonne Goolagong | #85 | #35 | — | 2,471 | 735 | 158 | 82.3% | 7 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 66 | 84 |
| Ann Jones | — | — | — | 2,178 | 254 | 64 | 79.9% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 28 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Evonne Goolagong | Ann Jones | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 74–19 | 79.6% | — | 1,999 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 96–16 | 85.7% | — | 2,174 | 2 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 89–10 | 89.9% | — | 2,238 | 2 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 102–14 | 87.9% | — | 2,297 | 2 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1974 | 64–11 | 85.3% | — | 2,326 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1975 | 53–13 | 80.3% | — | 2,265 | 4 | 62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1976 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,425 | 5 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1977 | 20–1 | 95.2% | — | 2,435 | 6 | 73 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1978 | 47–9 | 83.9% | — | 2,353 | 6 | 79 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1979 | 53–11 | 82.8% | — | 2,314 | 6 | 83 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1980 | 38–19 | 66.7% | — | 2,165 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1981 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 2,144 | 7 | 84 | 1968 | 41–10 | 80.4% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1982 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 2,052 | 7 | 84 | 1969 | 74–15 | 83.1% | — | 2,044 | 1 | 9 |
| 31 | 1983 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,943 | 7 | 84 | 1970 | 75–16 | 82.4% | — | 2,104 | 1 | 18 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 2,166 | 1 | 20 |
| 33 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,914 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 6–0 | 100.0% | — | 2,173 | 1 | 22 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 2,157 | 1 | 25 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 2,106 | 1 | 28 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 7–3 | 70.0% | — | 2,026 | 1 | 28 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 2,001 | 1 | 28 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,970 | 1 | 28 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,940 | 1 | 28 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,910 | 1 | 28 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,881 | 1 | 28 |