H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Evonne Goolagong vs Anne Smith H2H: 2-0

Evonne Goolagong holds a 2–0 lead over Anne Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Evonne Goolagong leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Evonne Goolagong won the 1979 Tokyo Sillook round of 16 6-7 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Evonne Goolagong
AUS Age 75 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Anne Smith
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Evonne Goolagong 6-7 6-0 6-4 Anne Smith Match data Sep 14, 1979* R16 Tokyo Sillook WTA 250 Hard
Evonne Goolagong 6-4 3-6 6-3 Anne Smith Match data Aug 11, 1979* QF Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Evonne Goolagong — #1 — 2,482 736 160 82.1% 7 0 2 8 68 85
Anne Smith — — — 2,053 221 173 56.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Evonne Goolagong Anne Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1968 9–4 69.2% — 1,578 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1969 13–8 61.9% — 1,631 0 3 1977 8–3 72.7% — 1,633 0 1
18 1970 74–19 79.6% — 2,001 0 13 1978 14–7 66.7% — 1,776 0 2
19 1971 94–15 86.2% — 2,177 2 26 1979 28–28 50.0% — 1,850 0 2
20 1972 89–10 89.9% — 2,244 2 39 1980 21–21 50.0% — 1,870 0 2
21 1973 105–15 87.5% — 2,298 2 51 1981 36–25 59.0% — 1,938 0 2
22 1974 64–11 85.3% — 2,351 3 59 1982 27–19 58.7% — 1,900 0 2
23 1975 53–15 77.9% #5 2,256 4 63 1983 11–9 55.0% — 1,899 0 2
24 1976 57–6 90.5% #2 2,438 5 70 1984 1–2 33.3% — 1,875 0 2
25 1977 20–1 95.2% — 2,449 6 74 1985 10–4 71.4% — 1,901 0 3
26 1978 47–9 83.9% #3 2,401 6 80 1986 8–13 38.1% — 1,719 0 3
27 1979 53–11 82.8% #4 2,389 6 84 1987 15–9 62.5% — 1,786 0 3
28 1980 38–19 66.7% #5 2,217 7 85 1988 8–8 50.0% — 1,778 0 3
29 1981 5–3 62.5% — 2,190 7 85 1989 10–6 62.5% — 1,851 0 3
30 1982 6–6 50.0% — 2,088 7 85 1990 16–14 53.3% — 1,827 0 3
31 1983 9–7 56.2% — 1,970 7 85 1991 8–5 61.5% — 1,821 0 3
33 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,940 7 85 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Evonne Goolagong Anne Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1968 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
18 1970 — — — — 46 9 55 83.6% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 1978 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
19 1971 8 2 10 80.0% 34 3 37 91.9% 36 5 41 87.8% 16 5 21 76.2% 1979 9 6 15 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 11 13 24 45.8%
20 1972 6 0 6 100.0% 33 3 36 91.7% 47 6 53 88.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 1980 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 11 19 42.1%
21 1973 8 2 10 80.0% 57 7 64 89.1% 36 5 41 87.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 16 11 27 59.3%
22 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 14 3 17 82.4% 37 5 42 88.1% 10 1 11 90.9% 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 17 13 30 56.7%
23 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 21 3 24 87.5% 22 7 29 75.9% 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0%
24 1976 1 1 2 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 2 15 86.7% 38 2 40 95.0% 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 20 0 20 100.0% — — — — 1985 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
26 1978 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 26 5 31 83.9% 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 1979 14 3 17 82.4% 14 5 19 73.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 8 1 9 88.9% 1987 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 1980 2 1 3 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 11 2 13 84.6% 19 13 32 59.4% 1988 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1981 — — — — — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1989 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 7 3 10 70.0%
30 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 1983 — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 16 61 73.8% 235 49 284 82.7% 306 58 364 84.1% 146 37 183 79.8% — 67 49 116 57.8% 20 24 44 45.5% 37 27 64 57.8% 88 73 161 54.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Evonne Goolagong Anne Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1968 1579 113.7 — — — — — +22 -16 65.5% +1.31 2–1 (67%) — — +0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 1631 119.0 — — — — — +3 -2 62.2% +0.87 1–2 (33%) — — +2.49 1977 1634 138.5 — — — — +87 — — 70.4% +1.74 2–3 (40%) — — +1.55
18 1970 2002 148.5 — — — — — +43 -34 73.1% +1.82 18–4 (82%) — — -2.81 1978 1776 139.7 — — — — +30 — — 68.3% +1.39 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.7 +0.91
19 1971 2177 163.9 — — — — -178 +39 +100 80.0% +2.29 19–8 (70%) 9–4 (69%) 110.4 -4.23 1979 1850 152.8 — — — — -10 -187 -233 48.5% -0.04 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 108.4 -3.72
20 1972 2245 167.1 — — — — -99 +89 +77 85.6% +2.86 10–4 (71%) 8–4 (67%) 103.9 -4.30 1980 1870 145.4 — — — — -29 -181 -221 47.8% -0.08 6–4 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 102.0 -5.91
21 1973 2299 171.3 — — — — -145 +134 +109 83.3% +2.75 13–5 (72%) 9–5 (64%) 102.6 -6.29 1981 1938 153.9 — — — — +39 -233 -158 57.9% +0.56 9–9 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.6 -4.67
22 1974 2351 167.4 — — — — -72 +43 +91 78.5% +2.12 17–7 (71%) 11–5 (69%) 104.6 -5.31 1982 1901 157.3 — — — — +44 -218 -38 60.2% +0.58 5–8 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 97.3 -1.41
23 1975 2256 168.1 — — — — -48 +110 +133 73.2% +1.71 10–5 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -6.22 1983 1900 140.2 — — — — +41 — — 51.1% +0.02 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 -2.39
24 1976 2439 178.8 — — — — +144 -83 -23 86.5% +2.94 6–1 (86%) 5–3 (63%) 106.3 -6.93 1984 1876 92.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.30
25 1977 2449 165.5 — — — — — — +82 87.2% +3.19 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — -0.55 1985 1902 131.2 — — — — — -250 -5 64.5% +0.90 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -1.35
26 1978 2402 170.2 — — — — +66 — +132 81.4% +2.45 7–2 (78%) 9–4 (69%) 102.5 -1.63 1986 1719 121.0 — — — — +23 -56 — 40.9% -0.36 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.84
27 1979 2390 168.6 — — — — +66 -117 +139 80.0% +2.27 11–2 (85%) 4–3 (57%) 100.8 -4.14 1987 1786 132.0 — — — — +8 — +61 60.0% +0.69 4–3 (57%) 0–1 — +0.59
28 1980 2218 171.8 — — — — +111 -3 +350 66.9% +1.37 5–7 (42%) 6–7 (46%) 90.5 -5.94 1988 1778 135.5 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.21 1–1 0–2 — -0.73
29 1981 2191 131.5 — — — — — — +294 58.8% +0.35 1–0 1–0 — -0.64 1989 1851 140.5 — — — — -5 — — 58.3% +0.50 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 -0.05
30 1982 2089 128.7 — — — — — — +199 53.6% +0.25 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — -1.14 1990 1828 147.1 — — — — -7 — +19 53.7% +0.49 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 98.2 -1.19
31 1983 1970 127.4 — — — — — +106 — 51.4% +0.14 3–0 (100%) 1–0 — -0.01 1991 1822 132.5 — — — — 0 — — 60.7% +0.46 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.30
33 1985 1941 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2482 170.0 — — — — +11 +58 +94 77.8% +2.18 130–52 (71%) 71–38 (65%) 111.1 -5.29 — 2053 154.5 — — — — +14 -191 -74 54.9% +0.38 58–49 (54%) 38–35 (52%) 106.2 -4.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.