H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Evonne Goolagong vs Barbara Potter H2H: 3-0
Evonne Goolagong holds a 3–0 lead over Barbara Potter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Evonne Goolagong leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Evonne Goolagong won the 1980 Toronto third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 1980 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Evonne Goolagong | 6-4 6-2 | Barbara Potter | Match data |
| Jun 14, 1979* | Chichester | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Evonne Goolagong | 6-3 6-1 | Barbara Potter | Match data |
| Jun 17, 1978* | Chichester | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Evonne Goolagong | 6-3 6-2 | Barbara Potter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evonne Goolagong | #85 | #35 | — | 2,471 | 735 | 158 | 82.3% | 7 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 66 | 84 |
| Barbara Potter | #112 | #10 | 63 | 2,096 | 299 | 190 | 61.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Evonne Goolagong | Barbara Potter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1969 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 8–22 | 26.7% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1970 | 74–19 | 79.6% | — | 1,999 | 0 | 13 | 1980 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1971 | 96–16 | 85.7% | — | 2,174 | 2 | 26 | 1981 | 47–23 | 67.1% | — | 1,943 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1972 | 89–10 | 89.9% | — | 2,238 | 2 | 38 | 1982 | 43–22 | 66.2% | — | 1,993 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1973 | 102–14 | 87.9% | — | 2,297 | 2 | 50 | 1983 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1974 | 64–11 | 85.3% | — | 2,326 | 3 | 58 | 1984 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,951 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1975 | 53–13 | 80.3% | — | 2,265 | 4 | 62 | 1985 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #15 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1976 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,425 | 5 | 69 | 1986 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #26 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1977 | 20–1 | 95.2% | — | 2,435 | 6 | 73 | 1987 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #12 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1978 | 47–9 | 83.9% | — | 2,353 | 6 | 79 | 1988 | 36–14 | 72.0% | #10 | 1,918 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1979 | 53–11 | 82.8% | — | 2,314 | 6 | 83 | 1989 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,845 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1980 | 38–19 | 66.7% | — | 2,165 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1981 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 2,144 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1982 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 2,052 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1983 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,943 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,914 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |