H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Evonne Goolagong vs Catherine Suire H2H: 1-0
Evonne Goolagong holds a 1–0 lead over Catherine Suire in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Evonne Goolagong leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Evonne Goolagong won the 1983 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 1983* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Evonne Goolagong | 6-3 6-2 | Catherine Suire | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evonne Goolagong | #85 | #35 | — | 2,471 | 735 | 158 | 82.3% | 7 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 66 | 84 |
| Catherine Suire | #513 | #52 | 13 | 1,692 | 77 | 128 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Evonne Goolagong | Catherine Suire | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 74–19 | 79.6% | — | 1,999 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 96–16 | 85.7% | — | 2,174 | 2 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 89–10 | 89.9% | — | 2,238 | 2 | 38 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1973 | 102–14 | 87.9% | — | 2,297 | 2 | 50 | 1981 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 64–11 | 85.3% | — | 2,326 | 3 | 58 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 53–13 | 80.3% | — | 2,265 | 4 | 62 | 1983 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1976 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,425 | 5 | 69 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1977 | 20–1 | 95.2% | — | 2,435 | 6 | 73 | 1985 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1978 | 47–9 | 83.9% | — | 2,353 | 6 | 79 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #84 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1979 | 53–11 | 82.8% | — | 2,314 | 6 | 83 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #135 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1980 | 38–19 | 66.7% | — | 2,165 | 7 | 84 | 1988 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #124 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1981 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 2,144 | 7 | 84 | 1989 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #139 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1982 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 2,052 | 7 | 84 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1983 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,943 | 7 | 84 | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #213 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,914 | 7 | 84 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |