H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Evonne Goolagong vs Chris Oneil H2H: 3-0
Evonne Goolagong holds a 3–0 lead over Chris Oneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Evonne Goolagong leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Evonne Goolagong won the 1982 Sydney third round 4-6 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 1982* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Evonne Goolagong | 4-6 7-6 6-3 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
| Dec 27, 1974* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Evonne Goolagong | 6-1 6-1 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1974* | Quirindi | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Evonne Goolagong | 4-6 6-1 6-1 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evonne Goolagong | #85 | #35 | — | 2,471 | 735 | 158 | 82.3% | 7 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 66 | 84 |
| Chris Oneil | — | — | — | 1,768 | 99 | 108 | 47.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Evonne Goolagong | Chris Oneil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 2 |
| 1969 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 2 |
| 1970 | 74–19 | 79.6% | — | 1,999 | 0 | 13 | 1974 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 1971 | 96–16 | 85.7% | — | 2,174 | 2 | 26 | 1975 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 4 |
| 1972 | 89–10 | 89.9% | — | 2,238 | 2 | 38 | 1976 | 14–6 | 70.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 7 |
| 1973 | 102–14 | 87.9% | — | 2,297 | 2 | 50 | 1977 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,636 | 0 | 7 |
| 1974 | 64–11 | 85.3% | — | 2,326 | 3 | 58 | 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,714 | 1 | 8 |
| 1975 | 53–13 | 80.3% | — | 2,265 | 4 | 62 | 1979 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,632 | 1 | 8 |
| 1976 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,425 | 5 | 69 | 1980 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,577 | 1 | 8 |
| 1977 | 20–1 | 95.2% | — | 2,435 | 6 | 73 | 1981 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,555 | 1 | 9 |
| 1978 | 47–9 | 83.9% | — | 2,353 | 6 | 79 | 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,598 | 1 | 9 |
| 1979 | 53–11 | 82.8% | — | 2,314 | 6 | 83 | 1983 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,528 | 1 | 9 |
| 1980 | 38–19 | 66.7% | — | 2,165 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 2,144 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 2,052 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,943 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,914 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |