H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Evonne Goolagong vs Christina Sandberg H2H: 1-2

Christina Sandberg holds a 2–1 lead over Evonne Goolagong in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Christina Sandberg leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Evonne Goolagong won the 1971 Dutch Open final 8-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Evonne Goolagong
AUS Age 75 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Christina Sandberg
SWE Age 78 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Evonne Goolagong 8-6 6-3 Christina Sandberg Match data Aug 1, 1971* F Dutch Open WTA 250 Clay
Christina Sandberg 3-6 6-2 6-2 Evonne Goolagong Match data Dec 1, 1969* SF Toowoomba WTA 250 Clay
Christina Sandberg 2-6 8-6 6-4 Evonne Goolagong Match data Nov 22, 1969* QF Rockdale WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Evonne Goolagong #85 #1 — 2,481 736 159 82.2% 7 0 2 8 68 85
Christina Sandberg — — — 1,839 130 90 59.1% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Evonne Goolagong Christina Sandberg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1968 9–4 69.2% — 1,578 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1969 13–8 61.9% — 1,631 0 3 — — — — — — —
18 1970 74–19 79.6% — 2,001 0 13 — — — — — — —
19 1971 94–15 86.2% — 2,177 2 26 — — — — — — —
20 1972 89–10 89.9% — 2,244 2 39 1968 22–15 59.5% — 1,631 0 1
21 1973 105–15 87.5% — 2,298 2 51 1969 27–17 61.4% — 1,714 0 3
22 1974 64–11 85.3% — 2,351 3 59 1970 27–13 67.5% — 1,812 0 6
23 1975 53–14 79.1% #5 2,260 4 63 1971 23–16 59.0% — 1,802 0 6
24 1976 57–6 90.5% #2 2,436 5 70 1972 7–8 46.7% — 1,719 0 7
25 1977 20–1 95.2% — 2,446 6 74 1973 16–9 64.0% — 1,737 0 8
26 1978 47–9 83.9% #3 2,400 6 80 1974 5–6 45.5% — 1,698 0 8
27 1979 53–11 82.8% #4 2,387 6 84 1975 1–2 33.3% — 1,682 0 8
28 1980 38–19 66.7% #5 2,215 7 85 1976 2–4 33.3% — 1,665 0 8
29 1981 5–3 62.5% — 2,188 7 85 — — — — — — —
30 1982 6–6 50.0% — 2,086 7 85 — — — — — — —
31 1983 9–7 56.2% — 1,968 7 85 — — — — — — —
33 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,938 7 85 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Evonne Goolagong Christina Sandberg
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1968 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 — — — — 46 9 55 83.6% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 8 2 10 80.0% 34 3 37 91.9% 36 5 41 87.8% 16 5 21 76.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 6 0 6 100.0% 33 3 36 91.7% 47 6 53 88.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 1968 2 2 4 50.0% 18 10 28 64.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1973 8 2 10 80.0% 57 7 64 89.1% 36 5 41 87.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 1969 0 1 1 0.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 0 7 100.0%
22 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 14 3 17 82.4% 37 5 42 88.1% 10 1 11 90.9% 1970 — — — — 12 4 16 75.0% 15 9 24 62.5% — — — —
23 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 21 3 24 87.5% 22 7 29 75.9% 1971 — — — — 14 9 23 60.9% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1976 1 1 2 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 2 15 86.7% 38 2 40 95.0% 1972 — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 0 2 100.0%
25 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 20 0 20 100.0% — — — — 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
26 1978 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 26 5 31 83.9% 1974 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 1979 14 3 17 82.4% 14 5 19 73.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 8 1 9 88.9% 1975 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
28 1980 2 1 3 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 11 2 13 84.6% 19 13 32 59.4% 1976 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 1981 — — — — — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 16 61 73.8% 235 48 283 83.0% 306 58 364 84.1% 146 37 183 79.8% — 3 4 7 42.9% 79 52 131 60.3% 39 32 71 54.9% 9 2 11 81.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Evonne Goolagong Christina Sandberg
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1968 1579 113.7 — — — — — +22 -16 65.5% +1.31 2–1 (67%) — — +0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 1631 119.0 — — — — — +3 -2 62.2% +0.87 1–2 (33%) — — +2.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 2002 148.5 — — — — — +43 -34 73.1% +1.82 18–4 (82%) — — -2.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 2177 163.9 — — — — -178 +39 +100 80.0% +2.29 19–8 (70%) 9–4 (69%) 110.4 -4.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 2245 167.1 — — — — -99 +89 +77 85.6% +2.86 10–4 (71%) 8–4 (67%) 103.9 -4.28 1968 1631 118.4 — — — — -126 +49 -93 60.0% +0.93 4–7 (36%) — — -0.11
21 1973 2299 171.3 — — — — -145 +134 +109 83.3% +2.75 13–5 (72%) 9–5 (64%) 102.6 -6.12 1969 1714 125.2 — — — — -15 +14 -105 55.6% +0.27 10–3 (77%) — — -1.41
22 1974 2351 167.4 — — — — -72 +43 +91 78.5% +2.12 17–7 (71%) 11–5 (69%) 104.6 -5.92 1970 1812 139.6 — — — — — +1 -24 63.5% +1.00 5–2 (71%) — — +0.18
23 1975 2261 167.4 — — — — -54 +112 +127 74.1% +1.80 10–5 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -5.65 1971 1803 137.7 — — — — — +11 +6 59.1% +0.73 4–8 (33%) — — -0.53
24 1976 2436 178.6 — — — — +145 -77 -22 86.5% +2.94 6–1 (86%) 5–3 (63%) 106.2 -6.86 1972 1720 113.5 — — — — — -3 +45 48.5% -0.33 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — +0.89
25 1977 2447 165.4 — — — — — — +85 87.2% +3.19 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — -0.55 1973 1737 130.3 — — — — — +4 +48 62.1% +0.76 4–4 (50%) 2–0 — +0.91
26 1978 2400 169.9 — — — — +62 — +135 81.4% +2.45 7–2 (78%) 9–4 (69%) 102.4 -1.73 1974 1698 117.8 — — — — — +53 +26 43.5% -0.09 1–0 — — -0.60
27 1979 2388 168.5 — — — — +66 -113 +142 80.0% +2.27 11–2 (85%) 4–3 (57%) 100.8 -4.29 1975 1683 107.0 — — — — — +54 — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.15
28 1980 2215 171.5 — — — — +110 +2 +349 66.9% +1.37 5–7 (42%) 6–7 (46%) 90.5 -5.70 1976 1666 112.2 — — — — — +83 +11 30.8% -1.15 1–0 0–1 — -0.53
29 1981 2188 131.2 — — — — — — +292 58.8% +0.35 1–0 1–0 — -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 2087 128.7 — — — — — — +197 53.6% +0.25 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 1968 127.4 — — — — — +111 — 51.4% +0.14 3–0 (100%) 1–0 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1939 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2482 169.9 — — — — +9 +59 +94 77.8% +2.19 130–52 (71%) 71–38 (65%) 111.0 -5.27 — 1840 133.7 — — — — -58 +22 -18 57.1% +0.54 30–28 (52%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.