H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Evonne Goolagong vs Dianne Fromholtz H2H: 14-1
Evonne Goolagong holds a 14–1 lead over Dianne Fromholtz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 15 main-draw meetings, Evonne Goolagong leads 7–0 on grass and 3–1 on carpet. Most recently, Evonne Goolagong won the 1980 Dallas semifinal 5-4 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
14
–
1
15 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 69
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evonne Goolagong | #85 | #35 | — | 2,471 | 735 | 158 | 82.3% | 7 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 66 | 84 |
| Dianne Fromholtz | #306 | #19 | 34 | 2,167 | 466 | 282 | 62.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Evonne Goolagong | Dianne Fromholtz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1968 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 57–13 | 81.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 12 |
| 17 | 1969 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 52–20 | 72.2% | — | 1,963 | 0 | 16 |
| 18 | 1970 | 74–19 | 79.6% | — | 1,999 | 0 | 13 | 1975 | 34–29 | 54.0% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 16 |
| 19 | 1971 | 96–16 | 85.7% | — | 2,174 | 2 | 26 | 1976 | 39–13 | 75.0% | — | 2,063 | 0 | 19 |
| 20 | 1972 | 89–10 | 89.9% | — | 2,238 | 2 | 38 | 1977 | 32–18 | 64.0% | — | 2,074 | 0 | 19 |
| 21 | 1973 | 102–14 | 87.9% | — | 2,297 | 2 | 50 | 1978 | 28–13 | 68.3% | — | 2,049 | 0 | 21 |
| 22 | 1974 | 64–11 | 85.3% | — | 2,326 | 3 | 58 | 1979 | 57–27 | 67.9% | — | 2,005 | 0 | 22 |
| 23 | 1975 | 53–13 | 80.3% | — | 2,265 | 4 | 62 | 1980 | 46–21 | 68.7% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 22 |
| 24 | 1976 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,425 | 5 | 69 | 1981 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 22 |
| 25 | 1977 | 20–1 | 95.2% | — | 2,435 | 6 | 73 | 1982 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 22 |
| 26 | 1978 | 47–9 | 83.9% | — | 2,353 | 6 | 79 | 1983 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 22 |
| 27 | 1979 | 53–11 | 82.8% | — | 2,314 | 6 | 83 | 1984 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,717 | 0 | 22 |
| 28 | 1980 | 38–19 | 66.7% | — | 2,165 | 7 | 84 | 1985 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,794 | 0 | 22 |
| 29 | 1981 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 2,144 | 7 | 84 | 1986 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #25 | 1,818 | 0 | 22 |
| 30 | 1982 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 2,052 | 7 | 84 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,850 | 0 | 22 |
| 31 | 1983 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,943 | 7 | 84 | 1988 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,749 | 0 | 22 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,674 | 0 | 22 |
| 33 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,914 | 7 | 84 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,631 | 0 | 22 |