H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Evonne Goolagong vs Iris Riedel Kuhn H2H: 3-0

Evonne Goolagong holds a 3–0 lead over Iris Riedel Kuhn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Evonne Goolagong leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Evonne Goolagong won the 1979 Italian Open quarterfinal 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Evonne Goolagong
AUS Age 75 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Iris Riedel Kuhn
FRG Age 72

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Evonne Goolagong 6-3 6-0 Iris Riedel Kuhn Match data May 12, 1979* QF Italian Open WTA 250 Clay
Evonne Goolagong 6-2 6-1 Iris Riedel Kuhn Match data Feb 8, 1976* QF Akron WTA 250 Carpet
Evonne Goolagong 6-1 7-5 Iris Riedel Kuhn Match data Jan 30, 1976* R16 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Evonne Goolagong — #1 — 2,482 736 160 82.1% 7 0 2 8 68 85
Iris Riedel Kuhn — — — 1,841 106 98 52.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Evonne Goolagong Iris Riedel Kuhn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1968 9–4 69.2% — 1,578 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1969 13–8 61.9% — 1,631 0 3 — — — — — — —
18 1970 74–19 79.6% — 2,001 0 13 1972 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0
19 1971 94–15 86.2% — 2,177 2 26 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
20 1972 89–10 89.9% — 2,244 2 39 1974 2–4 33.3% — 1,490 0 0
21 1973 105–15 87.5% — 2,298 2 51 1975 16–13 55.2% — 1,684 0 0
22 1974 64–11 85.3% — 2,351 3 59 1976 10–15 40.0% — 1,679 0 0
23 1975 53–15 77.9% #5 2,256 4 63 1977 13–14 48.1% — 1,706 0 0
24 1976 57–6 90.5% #2 2,438 5 70 1978 14–11 56.0% — 1,691 0 1
25 1977 20–1 95.2% — 2,449 6 74 1979 5–9 35.7% — 1,683 0 1
26 1978 47–9 83.9% #3 2,401 6 80 1980 29–10 74.4% — 1,817 0 4
27 1979 53–11 82.8% #4 2,389 6 84 1981 15–13 53.6% — 1,729 0 7
28 1980 38–19 66.7% #5 2,217 7 85 1982 1–6 14.3% — 1,626 0 7
29 1981 5–3 62.5% — 2,190 7 85 — — — — — — —
30 1982 6–6 50.0% — 2,088 7 85 — — — — — — —
31 1983 9–7 56.2% — 1,970 7 85 — — — — — — —
33 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,940 7 85 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Evonne Goolagong Iris Riedel Kuhn
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1968 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 — — — — 46 9 55 83.6% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1971 8 2 10 80.0% 34 3 37 91.9% 36 5 41 87.8% 16 5 21 76.2% 1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1972 6 0 6 100.0% 33 3 36 91.7% 47 6 53 88.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 1974 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
21 1973 8 2 10 80.0% 57 7 64 89.1% 36 5 41 87.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 1975 — — — — 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 14 3 17 82.4% 37 5 42 88.1% 10 1 11 90.9% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
23 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 21 3 24 87.5% 22 7 29 75.9% 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1976 1 1 2 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 2 15 86.7% 38 2 40 95.0% 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 20 0 20 100.0% — — — — 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1978 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 26 5 31 83.9% 1980 — — — — 25 7 32 78.1% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
27 1979 14 3 17 82.4% 14 5 19 73.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 8 1 9 88.9% 1981 — — — — 12 7 19 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1980 2 1 3 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 11 2 13 84.6% 19 13 32 59.4% 1982 — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — —
29 1981 — — — — — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 16 61 73.8% 235 49 284 82.7% 306 58 364 84.1% 146 37 183 79.8% — 2 6 8 25.0% 81 62 143 56.6% 3 8 11 27.3% 9 16 25 36.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Evonne Goolagong Iris Riedel Kuhn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1968 1579 113.7 — — — — — +22 -16 65.5% +1.31 2–1 (67%) — — +0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 1631 119.0 — — — — — +3 -2 62.2% +0.87 1–2 (33%) — — +2.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 2002 148.5 — — — — — +43 -34 73.1% +1.82 18–4 (82%) — — -2.81 1972 1485 97.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 — 1–0 — +0.36
19 1971 2177 163.9 — — — — -178 +39 +100 80.0% +2.29 19–8 (70%) 9–4 (69%) 110.4 -4.23 1973 1479 104.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.13
20 1972 2245 167.1 — — — — -99 +89 +77 85.6% +2.86 10–4 (71%) 8–4 (67%) 103.9 -4.30 1974 1491 113.8 — — — — — +14 — 45.5% -0.64 0–1 — — +0.29
21 1973 2299 171.3 — — — — -145 +134 +109 83.3% +2.75 13–5 (72%) 9–5 (64%) 102.6 -6.29 1975 1685 137.0 — — — — -42 +13 — 53.7% +0.22 7–6 (54%) 5–3 (63%) 104.4 -0.63
22 1974 2351 167.4 — — — — -72 +43 +91 78.5% +2.12 17–7 (71%) 11–5 (69%) 104.6 -5.31 1976 1680 125.4 — — — — -69 +22 — 41.4% -0.64 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — -0.95
23 1975 2256 168.1 — — — — -48 +110 +133 73.2% +1.71 10–5 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -6.22 1977 1707 135.3 — — — — -155 +70 — 48.4% -0.23 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.3 -1.03
24 1976 2439 178.8 — — — — +144 -83 -23 86.5% +2.94 6–1 (86%) 5–3 (63%) 106.3 -6.93 1978 1691 124.0 — — — — -96 -7 -169 58.6% +0.90 2–6 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 92.7 +2.72
25 1977 2449 165.5 — — — — — — +82 87.2% +3.19 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — -0.55 1979 1683 123.5 — — — — — +35 — 41.9% -1.35 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — -1.43
26 1978 2402 170.2 — — — — +66 — +132 81.4% +2.45 7–2 (78%) 9–4 (69%) 102.5 -1.63 1980 1817 139.2 — — — — -277 +141 — 72.0% +1.85 5–5 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.0 +2.39
27 1979 2390 168.6 — — — — +66 -117 +139 80.0% +2.27 11–2 (85%) 4–3 (57%) 100.8 -4.14 1981 1730 122.0 — — — — — +229 — 51.7% -0.26 4–2 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 103.5 -0.20
28 1980 2218 171.8 — — — — +111 -3 +350 66.9% +1.37 5–7 (42%) 6–7 (46%) 90.5 -5.94 1982 1627 97.1 — — — — — +128 — 29.4% -1.12 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.28
29 1981 2191 131.5 — — — — — — +294 58.8% +0.35 1–0 1–0 — -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 2089 128.7 — — — — — — +199 53.6% +0.25 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — -1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 1970 127.4 — — — — — +106 — 51.4% +0.14 3–0 (100%) 1–0 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1941 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2482 170.0 — — — — +11 +58 +94 77.8% +2.18 130–52 (71%) 71–38 (65%) 111.1 -5.29 — 1842 135.6 — — — — -114 +86 -169 52.7% +0.15 28–34 (45%) 14–12 (54%) 97.9 +0.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.