H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Evonne Goolagong vs Kathy Jordan H2H: 3-1

Evonne Goolagong holds a 3–1 lead over Kathy Jordan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Evonne Goolagong leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kathy Jordan won the 1980 Canadian Open quarterfinal 7-6 6-0.

AUS Age 75 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kathy Jordan 7-6 6-0 Evonne Goolagong Match data Aug 15, 1980* QF Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Evonne Goolagong 6-2 6-4 Kathy Jordan Match data Mar 17, 1980 QF WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Evonne Goolagong 4-6 6-1 6-2 Kathy Jordan Match data Feb 23, 1980* QF Detroit WTA 250 Carpet
Evonne Goolagong 7-6 6-7 6-1 Kathy Jordan Match data Jul 4, 1979* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Evonne Goolagong — #1 — 2,482 736 160 82.1% 7 0 2 8 68 85
Kathy Jordan — #5 44 2,094 249 155 61.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Evonne Goolagong Kathy Jordan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1968 9–4 69.2% — 1,578 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1969 13–8 61.9% — 1,631 0 3 — — — — — — —
18 1970 74–19 79.6% — 2,001 0 13 1978 4–3 57.1% — 1,560 0 0
19 1971 94–15 86.2% — 2,177 2 26 1979 25–13 65.8% — 1,895 0 1
20 1972 89–10 89.9% — 2,244 2 39 1980 37–21 63.8% — 2,003 0 1
21 1973 105–15 87.5% — 2,298 2 51 1981 28–20 58.3% — 1,923 0 1
22 1974 64–11 85.3% — 2,351 3 59 1982 21–18 53.8% — 1,886 0 2
23 1975 53–15 77.9% #5 2,256 4 63 1983 44–22 66.7% — 2,010 0 2
24 1976 57–6 90.5% #2 2,438 5 70 1984 23–11 67.6% #10 2,024 0 2
25 1977 20–1 95.2% — 2,449 6 74 1985 28–15 65.1% — 1,979 0 2
26 1978 47–9 83.9% #3 2,401 6 80 1986 25–15 62.5% #15 1,910 0 2
27 1979 53–11 82.8% #4 2,389 6 84 1987 12–10 54.5% #35 1,892 0 2
28 1980 38–19 66.7% #5 2,217 7 85 — — — — — — —
29 1981 5–3 62.5% — 2,190 7 85 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,874 0 2
30 1982 6–6 50.0% — 2,088 7 85 1990 2–6 25.0% #207 1,791 0 2
31 1983 9–7 56.2% — 1,970 7 85 — — — — — — —
33 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,940 7 85 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Evonne Goolagong Kathy Jordan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1968 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 — — — — 46 9 55 83.6% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
19 1971 8 2 10 80.0% 34 3 37 91.9% 36 5 41 87.8% 16 5 21 76.2% 1979 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
20 1972 6 0 6 100.0% 33 3 36 91.7% 47 6 53 88.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 1980 10 4 14 71.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 19 12 31 61.3%
21 1973 8 2 10 80.0% 57 7 64 89.1% 36 5 41 87.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 1981 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 11 9 20 55.0%
22 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 14 3 17 82.4% 37 5 42 88.1% 10 1 11 90.9% 1982 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
23 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 21 3 24 87.5% 22 7 29 75.9% 1983 15 5 20 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 14 6 20 70.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
24 1976 1 1 2 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 2 15 86.7% 38 2 40 95.0% 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 20 0 20 100.0% — — — — 1985 12 6 18 66.7% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 11 5 16 68.8%
26 1978 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 26 5 31 83.9% 1986 13 6 19 68.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 1979 14 3 17 82.4% 14 5 19 73.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 8 1 9 88.9% 1987 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 1980 2 1 3 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 11 2 13 84.6% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1981 — — — — — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 1990 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 1983 — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 16 61 73.8% 235 49 284 82.7% 306 58 364 84.1% 146 37 183 79.8% — 85 46 131 64.9% 20 18 38 52.6% 57 32 89 64.0% 87 59 146 59.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Evonne Goolagong Kathy Jordan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1968 1579 113.7 — — — — — +22 -16 65.5% +1.31 2–1 (67%) — — +0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 1631 119.0 — — — — — +3 -2 62.2% +0.87 1–2 (33%) — — +2.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 2002 148.5 — — — — — +43 -34 73.1% +1.82 18–4 (82%) — — -2.81 1978 1560 118.9 — — — — — — +41 58.8% +0.71 1–2 (33%) — — +0.06
19 1971 2177 163.9 — — — — -178 +39 +100 80.0% +2.29 19–8 (70%) 9–4 (69%) 110.4 -4.23 1979 1895 156.2 — — — — +33 — -202 61.0% +1.00 5–3 (63%) 1–4 (20%) 104.2 +0.09
20 1972 2245 167.1 — — — — -99 +89 +77 85.6% +2.86 10–4 (71%) 8–4 (67%) 103.9 -4.30 1980 2003 164.4 — — — — +39 -361 -262 63.3% +0.95 5–7 (42%) 5–1 (83%) 102.2 -5.85
21 1973 2299 171.3 — — — — -145 +134 +109 83.3% +2.75 13–5 (72%) 9–5 (64%) 102.6 -6.29 1981 1923 148.5 — — — — +52 -259 -74 60.0% +0.90 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 97.2 +0.92
22 1974 2351 167.4 — — — — -72 +43 +91 78.5% +2.12 17–7 (71%) 11–5 (69%) 104.6 -5.31 1982 1886 146.5 — — — — +57 -207 -61 53.2% +0.03 8–8 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 99.2 -3.98
23 1975 2256 168.1 — — — — -48 +110 +133 73.2% +1.71 10–5 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -6.22 1983 2011 155.7 — — — — -21 -248 -32 62.3% +1.00 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 103.8 -2.22
24 1976 2439 178.8 — — — — +144 -83 -23 86.5% +2.94 6–1 (86%) 5–3 (63%) 106.3 -6.93 1984 2025 159.8 — — — — -49 -277 +115 65.3% +1.16 4–3 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 99.9 -2.58
25 1977 2449 165.5 — — — — — — +82 87.2% +3.19 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — -0.55 1985 1980 155.5 — — — — +58 — +37 59.8% +1.02 13–5 (72%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 -2.86
26 1978 2402 170.2 — — — — +66 — +132 81.4% +2.45 7–2 (78%) 9–4 (69%) 102.5 -1.63 1986 1911 153.4 — — — — +59 — +131 62.2% +1.00 4–6 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 96.2 -1.55
27 1979 2390 168.6 — — — — +66 -117 +139 80.0% +2.27 11–2 (85%) 4–3 (57%) 100.8 -4.14 1987 1893 137.3 — — — — +45 — +97 56.3% +0.46 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 99.1 -1.56
28 1980 2218 171.8 — — — — +111 -3 +350 66.9% +1.37 5–7 (42%) 6–7 (46%) 90.5 -5.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1981 2191 131.5 — — — — — — +294 58.8% +0.35 1–0 1–0 — -0.64 1989 1875 106.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.26
30 1982 2089 128.7 — — — — — — +199 53.6% +0.25 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — -1.14 1990 1792 109.8 — — — — +35 — +143 30.0% -1.60 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -1.37
31 1983 1970 127.4 — — — — — +106 — 51.4% +0.14 3–0 (100%) 1–0 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1941 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2482 170.0 — — — — +11 +58 +94 77.8% +2.18 130–52 (71%) 71–38 (65%) 111.1 -5.29 — 2095 160.7 — — — — +33 -276 -9 59.9% +0.80 67–55 (55%) 35–31 (53%) 101.2 -5.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.